• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Sony Crams 3,700 Blu-Rays' Worth of Storage in a Single Cassette Tape

John Connor

John Connor

Lifer
http://gizmodo.com/sony-crams-3-700...source=gizmodo_facebook&utm_medium=socialflow

Sony's technique, which will be discussed at today's International Magnetics Conference in Dresden, uses a vacuum-forming technique called sputter deposition to create a layer of magnetic crystals by shooting argon ions at a polymer film substrate. The crystals, measuring just 7.7 nanometers on average, pack together more densely than any other previous method.
The result: three Blu-Rays' worth of data can fit on one square inch of Sony's new wonder-tape.
Click to expand...


DAMN!
 
Meh I'd still rather have 3 Blu-Rays. I'd still get to the data I want faster on average considering how long it takes to scroll through miles of tape.
 
Segate had a 1 terabit per square inch drive in the works a couple years ago. Or 128 gigabytes.

I guess tape is still a much cheaper solution for backing up large databases. Though it's useless for anything else. However, the technology will probably port over to hard drives.

So if a 3.5'' hard drive has roughly 28sq-in (30, minus the spindle hole) surface area, you could store roughly 4TB per platter using similar technology, or 8TB if you write to both sides.
 
If they were ever to market something like this, they'll so encumber it with shitty DRM that it'll be unusable.
 
I heard for years that crystals would eventually replace optical. Making this practical for consumers though may take some time.
 
Kadarin said:
If they were ever to market something like this, they'll so encumber it with shitty DRM that it'll be unusable.
Click to expand...

Or install it in only Sony branded computers, and charge double what competitors do for the same storage. Vita, I'm looking at you.
 
Crystals really are a better medium for storing large great works compared to discs.

I saw it on Sliders.
 
They must have come up with a much more robust blank tape, those of us oldies remember loading software into Commodore 64's and praying it would actually load, even a tiny crinkle in the tape meant your program didn't load and you wasted 15 minutes waiting for it to do so.
 
BUTCH1 said:
They must have come up with a much more robust blank tape, those of us oldies remember loading software into Commodore 64's and praying it would actually load, even a tiny crinkle in the tape meant your program didn't load and you wasted 15 minutes waiting for it to do so.
Click to expand...

It was still better than spending all weekend typing in new game code from a magazine, only to loose it with an accidental power off.
 
No no no no. We are supposed to be moving AWAY from this archaic mechanical shit.

I'll be impressed when we have 50 GB/sec + nanosecond random access times in non volatile electronic solid state storage that is fast enough to be used as RAM, retains data without power, and doesn't wear out in a reasonable amount of time eg before it's obsolete and replaced.
 
Last edited:
GagHalfrunt said:
Miles of tape not found.
Click to expand...

So the tape only is 1 inch long? That makes it pretty useless, don't you think?

The problem with tape is that, if you want to read a file at the start of the tape and one at the end of it, you have to scroll through the whole tape. Go too fast and the tape breaks.

Edit: That's why tapes are still used for backup purposes, and not anymore for storage of files that have to be accessed regularly. Capacity is indeed more important than seek times for backups.
 
Last edited:
isn't it only 300GB with 1TB possibly in future? didn't sony say blu ray would be higher capacities as well?
 
tommo123 said:
isn't it only 300GB with 1TB possibly in future? didn't sony say blu ray would be higher capacities as well?
Click to expand...

There is no backup system yet that uses this new technique, but with it tapes should be able to hold 185TB, as described in the article linked in the OP's article:
http://www.extremetech.com/computin...s-3700-times-more-storage-than-a-blu-ray-disc

Blu ray has the slight disadvantage of either needing a 3700 disc rotation system (and storage for that number of discs) to burn that amount of data, or a few people sitting next to the system to swap all the discs manually 😉
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top