Came across this while check up on Tech news:
Full article here: http://www.newsfactor.com/news/Sony-Sued-for-Pulling-Linux-on-PS3/story.xhtml?story_id=13100EVA7YX6
My question...for those legal minded people, how likely and how helpfull would this be to a nVidia suit for removing physX from GeForce cards and the Agia PPU when an ATI card is detected has the primary card?
***I am not trying to turn this into a PhysX debate, so if possible please refrain.***
NewsFactor said:The suit, filed on April 27 by Anthony Ventura of California, seeks to redress Sony for the "intentional disablement of the valuable functionality originally advertised as available" for the Playstation 3. The disabling of Linux support is not only in breach of the sales contract between Sony and its customers, the suit says, but also a deceptive business practice "perpetrated on millions of unsuspecting customers."
Full article here: http://www.newsfactor.com/news/Sony-Sued-for-Pulling-Linux-on-PS3/story.xhtml?story_id=13100EVA7YX6
My question...for those legal minded people, how likely and how helpfull would this be to a nVidia suit for removing physX from GeForce cards and the Agia PPU when an ATI card is detected has the primary card?
***I am not trying to turn this into a PhysX debate, so if possible please refrain.***
Last edited: