I'm sure we could go back and forth literally all night discussing views, but when you make statements such as, "how much do you really know about saddam? how much do you know about iraq and their society?", in response to a my statement that "(Saddam is a prime example of one that doesn't believe in human harmony).", why would you expect people to take you seriously. I think you are well-intentioned, but argument just for the sake of argument isn't progressive. You can draw the simple conclusion that Saddam doesn't believe in human harmony based on the facts that; he has sole power over the nation of Iraq and decides to brutally opress his people, he invaded Kuwait for the purpose of raiding their gold reserve, he gassed countless kurdish people, he launched scud missles at Israel. I mean, the phony "anti-war" movement gives the benefit of the doubt to Saddam Hussein rather than George W. Bush. If that isn't backwards thinking then I am living in the twilight zone. *cue music*
