It's a superior currency which can not be manipulated, unlike paper currencies which can be counterfeited and devalued by government printing. It is also not controlled by a government, so no tinkering like our federal reserve bank does.
50% loss in a century. That's exactly like a 90% loss in under a year. Mind. Blown.
Cannot be manipulated? You can't be serious. What reason do you have for its meteoric rise in value then?
There's this thing called supply and demand.
Given that supply is growing slowly, and more and more people are using it... well you know the rest.
Cannot be manipulated? You can't be serious. What reason do you have for its meteoric rise in value then?
So you believe that 100% of the people that are involved with bitcoins are using them and none of them are hoarding them to artificially lower supply?
The "manipulation" you were referring to that currencies like the USD and EU are subject to is central banks just handing out new money, artificially increasing the supply.
Clearly your understanding of market and manipulation are overlapped somewhere. Can you print more of it on a whim? Can you destroy it? Can you arbitrarily change it's value?
no, no, and no. Can not be manipulated.
Can it's value go up and down over time? Of course. That's whole whole god damned idea, a 100% market-driven completely secure currency.
That's what the dollar is supposed to be in theory; but then government!
The U.S. dollar has lost 97.8% of its value since the creation of the Federal Reserve: In 1913--the year of the creation of the Federal Reserve--one ounce of gold could be purchased for $20.67, whereas now it costs $939.2 (spot price, as of 3/8/09).
Unlike Bitcoin, where supply is artificially reduced, facilitating hoarders.
Motives are irrelevant in supply and demand, are they not? The "manipulation" you were referring to that currencies like the USD and EU are subject to is central banks just handing out new money, artificially increasing the supply. Hoarding doesn't change supply, it only changes circulation.
here's a better one, with some context. Though it only goes up to the beginning of 2009.
![]()
as of just a few seconds ago, ounce of gold to USD is $1597
You can change around words but it doesn't make it any different. If I bought 100 bitcoins and essentially buried them in my backyard then supply has been reduced. So has circulation. I artificially decreased the supply and circulation to fit my own goals, hence manipulation.
If you only compare the dollar to an ounce of gold then you are correct.
I can go out right now and buy a double cheeseburger at McDonalds for $1. Try buying all the ingredients to create a burger back in 1913 and let me know how much it costs all things relative.
![]()
And that was in the 50's
Imagine how cheap a cheeseburger would have been if McDonald's was around in 1913
explain how supply is artificially reduced.
McDonalds opened in 1940. I'll compare a single patty burger even though the McDouble is a whole lot more than a 1940 burger.
http://www.dollartimes.com/calculators/inflation.htm
$0.15 in 1940 had the same buying power as $2.46 in 2013.
So a double cheeseburger is actually 40% cheaper than it was in 1940. Thanks for confirming my point. Not everything is relative to gold buddy.
Artificial cap on Bitcoins.
Hoarding.
Lost private keys.
So a double cheeseburger is actually 30% cheaper than it was in 1955.