• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Some of Bush Fund-Raisers Got Appointments

conjur

No Lifer
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmp..._perks_1&printer=1
WASHINGTON - One-third of President Bush (news - web sites)'s top 2000 fund-raisers or their spouses were appointed to positions in his first administration, from ambassadorships in Europe to seats on policy-setting boards, an Associated Press review found.

The perks for 246 "pioneers" who raised at least $100,000 also included overnight stays at the White House and Camp David, parties at the White House and Bush's Texas ranch, state dinners with world leaders and overseas travel with U.S. delegations to the Olympics and other events, the review found.

Top fund-raisers say the real charm of the rewards was getting the chance to rub elbows with the president.

"All of us in politics, we've done so many parties and receptions it's old hat to us," said David Miner, a North Carolina textile executive and state lawmaker who helped raise more than $100,000 for Bush in 2000. He was rewarded with invitations to the White House, the vice presidential mansion and Bush's ranch.

"But knowing that here's the commander in chief, the most powerful man on the face of the earth, and you have this first-name-basis with him, that's very special," Miner said.

For some, the chance to mingle with the world's power brokers came in the form of diplomatic appointments. At least two dozen of the 2000 pioneers or their spouses became ambassadors, mostly to Europe.

Howard Leach, a California agribusiness investment banker and former finance chairman of the Republican National Committee (news - web sites), went to Paris. Lobbyist Peter Terpeluk went to Luxembourg.

At least 57 contributors or their spouses were named to agency positions, advisory or decision-making committees and boards or to U.S. delegations.

James Langdon, a Washington lawyer, was named to the President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board, which advises Bush on intelligence-gathering and counterintelligence. Langdon also was among guests at a state dinner honoring the president of Poland, has stayed overnight at Camp David and served on Bush's energy transition team.

Hersh Kozlov, a New Jersey lawyer, was appointed to the Advisory Committee for Trade Policy and Negotiation, which advises Bush on trade agreements. Texas lobbyist Roger Wallace joined the Inter-American Foundation board, which provides development grants to Central America and the Caribbean.

Three top Bush fund-raisers became Cabinet secretaries: Bush 2000 finance chairman Don Evans at Commerce, Elaine Chao at Labor and Tom Ridge at Homeland Security. At least eight took other high-profile administration jobs, such as State Department chief financial officer Christopher Burnham and Jose Fourquet, U.S. executive director of the Inter-American Development Bank.


White House spokeswoman Erin Healy said Bush appointed the contributors because he believed they were well qualified. "His main objective in appointing someone is finding the person who will get the job done, and someone who has the best qualifications," Healy said.

The practice of rewarding big donors and fund-raisers with ambassadorships and government appointees is ingrained in Washington. Former President Clinton (news - web sites), in his first year in office, picked five $100,000-plus Democratic donors to be ambassadors.

"Just because it is done often does not make it right," said Larry Noble, executive director of the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan campaign finance watchdog group.

While the appointed pioneers may be qualified for the jobs, Noble said, "Clearly the White House was not looking at a total pool of talent available out there."

Noble predicts competition among Bush's top 2004 fund-raisers for plum administration jobs will be tougher than in 2000, both because there are fewer positions open and because Bush now has twice as many $100,000-and-up fund-raisers as he did in his first campaign.

In the first Bush administration, pioneers' spouses also got into the action. About a half-dozen spouses were given spots on panels such as the board of advisers at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts and the National Museum Services Board.

Michelle Engler, a lawyer who is married to former Michigan Gov. John Engler, was named to the Federal Home Mortgage Insurance Corp. board. It oversees a government-sponsored company that finances and insures billions of dollars worth of home mortgages.

In addition to the appointments, at least three-dozen pioneers or others at their companies had front-row seats as Bush assembled his first administration and set policy priorities. Energy, Treasury and Commerce were the most popular transition teams among Bush pioneers.

Tom Kuhn, head of the Edison Electric Institute, was on Bush's energy transition team. So, too, was 2000 pioneer Kenneth Lay, a longtime Bush friend and donor who now faces criminal charges in the Enron scandal. He was not on the list of top Bush re-election fund-raisers.

Allan Hubbard, president of the E&A Industries chemical conglomerate, was invited to take part in Bush's August 2002 economic summit in Texas, as was Floyd Kvamme, a California high-tech executive named to the President's Committee of Advisers on Science and Technology.

About a dozen pioneers were invited to state dinners with foreign dignitaries such as Polish President Aleksander Kwasniewski and Kenyan President Mwai Kibaki, or stayed overnight at the White House or Camp David.

San Diego Chargers owner Alex Spanos joined the president's parents, former President George H.W. Bush and Barbara Bush, on the U.S. delegation to last summer's Olympics in Athens. Other pioneers were invited to represent the United States in the Dominican Republic and Costa Rica for presidential inaugurations and Rome to celebrate the pope's anniversary.
Yay! Financial nepotism!!
 
Happens with every election. What is new?

Show me one previous administration in the past 200 years that this has not happended to.

Try to find something unique to start a qualification thread about.
 
Originally posted by: EagleKeeper
Happens with every election. What is new?

Show me one previous administration in the past 200 years that this has not happended to.

Try to find something unique to start a qualification thread about.

It's not wrong to you? Being able to pay for "democratic" power?
 
I don't think it's ever happened on this scale before. Job appointment based on merit and experience? Feh! Business buddies and family work just fine for Dubya.


I remember hearing some radio show cite Bush's choice for Ambassador to France...who didn't speak French. Anyone know if that's for real?


Edit: How bout that, Howard Leach, US Ambassador to France, doesn't speak French. :roll:
 
Originally posted by: Forsythe
Originally posted by: EagleKeeper
Happens with every election. What is new?

Show me one previous administration in the past 200 years that this has not happended to.

Try to find something unique to start a qualification thread about.

It's not wrong to you? Being able to pay for "democratic" power?

I do feel that it is wrong.

I am saying that to just pretend that it just started is being a hypocrit.

Most people in politics need support of others to get them there. People put their lives on hold, reputations on the line and expend captial to show that they can put the money where the mouth is.

Those that are that way, usually do it with the expection of a payback of some type.

The same logic can also apply to pardons for past deeds.

 
Originally posted by: EagleKeeper
Originally posted by: Forsythe
Originally posted by: EagleKeeper
Happens with every election. What is new?

Show me one previous administration in the past 200 years that this has not happended to.

Try to find something unique to start a qualification thread about.

It's not wrong to you? Being able to pay for "democratic" power?

I do feel that it is wrong.

I am saying that to just pretend that it just started is being a hypocrit.

Most people in politics need support of others to get them there. People put their lives on hold, reputations on the line and expend captial to show that they can put the money where the mouth is.

Those that are that way, usually do it with the expection of a payback of some type.

The same logic can also apply to pardons for past deeds.

So in other words, you approve of people with deep pockets running our country instead of the folks most qualified for the positions?

Do you think we should disregard these facts merely because they're 'normal'?
 
Originally posted by: EagleKeeper
Originally posted by: Forsythe
Originally posted by: EagleKeeper
Happens with every election. What is new?

Show me one previous administration in the past 200 years that this has not happended to.

Try to find something unique to start a qualification thread about.
It's not wrong to you? Being able to pay for "democratic" power?
I do feel that it is wrong.

I am saying that to just pretend that it just started is being a hypocrit.

Most people in politics need support of others to get them there. People put their lives on hold, reputations on the line and expend captial to show that they can put the money where the mouth is.

Those that are that way, usually do it with the expection of a payback of some type.

The same logic can also apply to pardons for past deeds.
Who's saying it just started?

If we all keep accepting it as normal then it will never be corrected. If protest and protest loudly, perhaps it will start sinking into these politicians' heads that they better start picking people who actually are qualified for the job.
 
Originally posted by: conjurIf we all keep accepting it as normal then it will never be corrected. If protest and protest loudly, perhaps it will start sinking into these politicians' heads that they better start picking people who actually are qualified for the job.

Better to punish them for selecting/approving people that you do not feel are qualified when it comes time for the next election.

 
What is the other option.

Most will ignore the complaints by passing the buck or providing lip service.
 
Originally posted by: EagleKeeper
Originally posted by: conjurIf we all keep accepting it as normal then it will never be corrected. If protest and protest loudly, perhaps it will start sinking into these politicians' heads that they better start picking people who actually are qualified for the job.

Better to punish them for selecting/approving people that you do not feel are qualified when it comes time for the next election.

Better still to have a small federal gov't with limited powers (as was originally created in the Constitution). Corruption follows power; if you want to limit gov't corruption, limit gov't power. They're inextricably linked.
 
It has long been a complaint about the American diplomatic corps that most of the positions are filled for political payback reasons, not based on qualifications. This is especially true for the major positions and countries.

This is true for many other countries, but is very common for the USA.

At times you get a very good appointment of a successful businessman who does a great job of representing the USA. Other times you get a terrible front man.

In eneral, the day-to-day work is done by State department employees that make it their career to serve in these posts.

Michael
 
so you donate lots of money to the presidency in order to get a seat in a government agency that influences your old business market. Except now they are making a lot less money than back in the private sector.

Interesting.

Its sort of opposite of be a government employee and help Company B win a military contract and then quit and get hired at company B in a top position and get a big salary boost.
 
this is done by all new presidents. if you were elected president, would you appoint someone who helped
you get elected or someone who bashed you every day?..
 
Originally posted by: slyedog
this is done by all new presidents. if you were elected president, would you appoint someone who helped
you get elected or someone who bashed you every day?..
I wouldn't. I'd nominate someone that I thought was worthy of the job due to their experience.
 
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: LtPage1
its called politics. get over it.
Ah, another mindless automaton content to live life in ignorant bliss.

It has nothing to do with ignorant bliss. At some point you have to draw a line and realize that on the other side are problems that you are not going to correct by posting a message on an internet forum.

I wouldn't. I'd nominate someone that I thought was worthy of the job due to their experience.

And this is why you would never be President, Senator, etc. Ignorance is bliss, eh?
 
Originally posted by: tallest1

So in other words, you approve of people with deep pockets running our country instead of the folks most qualified for the positions?

Do you think we should disregard these facts merely because they're 'normal'?

Qualifications??? You have to be joking, no such thing anymore, it's just who you know and "Gotta Have Faith" ya ya , Faith Faith Faith, sing it Micheal. :laugh: :thumbsup:
 
Originally posted by: Fingolfin269
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: LtPage1
its called politics. get over it.
Ah, another mindless automaton content to live life in ignorant bliss.
It has nothing to do with ignorant bliss. At some point you have to draw a line and realize that on the other side are problems that you are not going to correct by posting a message on an internet forum.
Oh, yes it does. Blindly accepting something because that's the way it's been done for years will accomplish nothing. And, believe me, I am doing more than just posting on an internet forum.

I wouldn't. I'd nominate someone that I thought was worthy of the job due to their experience.
And this is why you would never be President, Senator, etc. Ignorance is bliss, eh?
No, that's why I will do what I can to change things. The fact that I would actually nominate people who would be qualified for those positions means I would never get elected speaks volumes as to what is wrong with the way our government is being run.
 
Originally posted by: kage69
I don't think it's ever happened on this scale before. Job appointment based on merit and experience? Feh! Business buddies and family work just fine for Dubya.

You kidding? The Clinton adminstration was FAMOUS for this!

 
Originally posted by: Fritzo
Originally posted by: kage69
I don't think it's ever happened on this scale before. Job appointment based on merit and experience? Feh! Business buddies and family work just fine for Dubya.
You kidding? The Clinton adminstration was FAMOUS for this!
Call me lazy today but would you mind posting some links? I'd really like to see how broad those "financial depotism" appointments were under Clinton.
 
From my morning paper.

Bush rewarded 246 top fund-raisers with posts
Friday, November 19, 2004
BY SHARON THEIMER
Associated Press

A third of President Bush's top 2000 fund-raisers or their spouses were appointed to positions in his first administration, from ambassadorships in Europe to seats on policy-setting boards, an Associated Press review found.

The perks for 246 "pioneers" who raised at least $100,000 also included overnight stays at the White House and Camp David and overseas travel with U.S. delegations to the Olympics and other events, the review found.

Top fund-raisers say the real charm of the rewards was getting the chance to rub elbows with the president.

"All of us in politics, we've done so many parties and receptions it's old hat to us. But knowing that here's the commander in chief, the most powerful man on the face of the earth, and you have this first- name-basis with him, that's very special," said David Miner, a North Carolina textile executive and state lawmaker who helped raise more than $100,000 for Bush in 2000. He was rewarded with invitations to the White House, the vice presidential mansion and Bush's ranch.

At least two dozen of the 2000 pioneers or their spouses became ambassadors, mostly to Europe. At least 57 contributors or their spouses were named to agency positions, advisory or decision-making committees and boards, or U.S. delegations.

Three top Bush fund-raisers became Cabinet secretaries: Bush 2000 finance chairman Don Evans at Commerce, Elaine Chao at Labor and Tom Ridge at Homeland Security.

Hersh Kozlov, managing partner of a Cherry Hill law office, was appointed to the Advisory Committee for Trade Policy and Negotiation, which advises Bush on trade agreements.

Christopher Christie became U.S. attorney for New Jersey.

White House spokeswoman Erin Healy said Bush's "main objective in appointing someone is finding the person who will get the job done, and someone who has the best qualifications."

The practice is ingrained in Washington. Bill Clinton, in his first year in office, picked five $100,000-plus Democratic donors to be ambassadors.

"Just because it is done often does not make it right," said Larry Noble, executive director of the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics. "Clearly the White House was not looking at a total pool of talent available out there."

Perks for "Pioneers"

Here are administration posts given to some of the top Bush 2000 fund-raisers. (Asterisks denote spouses of top fund-raisers.)

Ambasadors:

Austria: Lee Brown

Bahamas: John Rood

Belgium: Stephen Brauer

Belize: Russ Freeman

Czech Republic: Craig Stapleton*

Dominican Republic: Hans Hertell

France: Howard Leach

Hungary: Nancy Brinker

Ireland: Richard Egan

Luxembourg: Peter Terpeluk

Malta: Antonny Gioia

Mauritius: John Price

Netherlands: Clifford Sobel*

New Zealand: Charles Swindells

Norway: John Ong

Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe: Stephan Minikes

Portugal: John Palmer

Singapore: Franklin Lavin

Slovak Republic: Ronald Weiser

Spain: George Argyros

Sweden: Teel Bivins

Switzerland: Mercer Reynolds

Uruguay: Martin Silverstein

Vatican: Jim Nicholson
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Board Memberships

Advisory Committee for Trade policy and Negotiations: Hersh Kozlov

Board of Visitors to U.S. Air Force Academy: James "Buck" Harless

Corporation for National and Commutity Service: Steve Goldsmith

Fullbright Foreign Scholarship board: Ronald Spogli

Inter-American Foundation board: Jack Vaughn Jr., Roger Wallace

Internal Revenue Service Oversight Board: Ray Wagner

Kennedy Center: Lawrence Bathgate; Melvin Estrin; Tom Foley; David Girard-diCarlo; James Haslam; Nancy Kinder; Dwight Schar

National Infrastructure Advisory Council: Erle Nye

National Selective Service Appeal Board: Glenn Steil

Overseas Private Investment Corp.: Ned Siegel

President's Advisory Commission on Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders: Zach Zachariah

President's Commission on White House Fellowships: Martha Chayet; Brad Freeman; Alan Novak

President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology: Bobbie Kilberg; Floyd Kvamme

President's Export Council: C. Michael Kojaian; Solomon Truijillo

President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board: Bill DeWitt; James Langdon

Reform Board, Amtrak: David Laney

U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy: Charles Evers

U.S. Holocaust Memorial Council: Rudy Boschwitz; William Danhof

Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars: Charles Glazer; David Metzner
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cabinet

Commerce Secretary: Don Evans

Homeland Security Secretary: Tom Ridge

Labor Secretary: Elaine Chao
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Other

Chief financial officer, State Department: Christopher Burnham

Deputy assistant secretary of Commerce Department's International Trade Administration: Joseph Bogosian

Iraq Caolition Provisional Authority private sector development director: Tom Foley

Undersecretary of Army: Matt Fong

U.S. attorney: Christopher Christie

U.S. district judge: William Martini

U.S. executive director of Inter-American Development Bank: Jose Fourquet

U.S. alternate director of the Inter-American Development Bank: Jouge Arrizurieta

U.S. alternate executive director of Treasury Department's Internation Bank for Reconstruction and Develooment: Robert B. Holland III

U.S. delegation to Costa Rica for president's inauguration: Joseph O'Neill

U.S. delegation to Dominican Republic for president's inauguration: Raul Romero

U.S. delegation to Summer Olympics in Athens: Alex Spanos

U.S. delegation to Rome for Pope John Paul II's anniversary: Josept Canizaro

-- Associated Press

 
PS The above is a partial list. Past administrations (including Clinton) never took it to the extremes of the Bush administration (if anyone has proof otherwise please post it instead of making unsubstantiated claims).

But this is an administration of extremists, so extreme policies and extreme abuse are to be expected I suppose, right?

 
Back
Top