Some lawmakers said no to stimulus bill, but not its cash

JEDIYoda

Lifer
Jul 13, 2005
33,986
3,321
126
Yessiree!!! Politics at it`s finest...oh the hipocrisy....

http://news.yahoo.com/s/mcclatchy/20100228/pl_mcclatchy/3437744

WASHINGTON — Democrats dubbed them "highway hypocrites," the mostly Republican lawmakers who voted against last year's $862 billion economic stimulus bill but tried to get money from it for projects in their home states.

Idaho's three Republicans and sole Democrat all voted against the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, for example, yet they also championed projects that were paid for with stimulus money.

The bipartisan foursome joined to write letters that supported the work of several Idaho communities that were trying to land a piece of a highly competitive $1.5 billion transportation grant program created by the recovery act. None of the Idaho projects got any money.

However, the state did get $468 million for nuclear waste cleanup at the Idaho National Laboratory , an award that the entire delegation praised and that pushed the state, population 1.5 million, to the top tier of per-capita stimulus funding.

"I'm not one who says there were no jobs created by it, or no jobs saved by it," said Republican Rep. Mike Simpson , whose district includes the nuclear lab. "I mean, obviously there were, whether it was in transportation or other areas."

However, Simpson said, "Once it's passed, my constituents are going to pay the taxes just like everybody else. And it would be silly for a state or a congressman to say, 'Well, we're going to pay the taxes to pay off that debt, but we're not going to take any of the benefits of it.' "

That kind of reasoning has prompted the White House and Democrats to say, "I told you so" to Republicans who've continued to charge that the massive spending plan was wasteful but have lobbied for stimulus

there is more....
http://news.yahoo.com/s/mcclatchy/20100228/pl_mcclatchy/3437744
 

cubby1223

Lifer
May 24, 2004
13,518
42
86
yeah yeah yeah

Yet another purely partisan-motivated attack.

What will MSNBC's new topic be next week?
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
No one is saying Republicans who voted against the stimulus should turn away their share.

THey are saying the Republicans who voted against it shouldn't by hypocrites by taking credit, one minute saying 'it won't create any jobs' voting no, and the next saying 'I got you all this money'.

When they show up at ribbon cutting ceremoies for stimulus projects implying it was their doing without any word how they opposed it, that's not the most honest.
 

Slew Foot

Lifer
Sep 22, 2005
12,379
96
86
Nothing wrong with that.

If someone said they were going to hand out $10000 to everyone in the country, most smart people would say no because of the rampant inflation it would cause. But after all the stupid people vote yes and it goes through, youd be an idiot not to accept it, otherwise youre paying for it and not getting any benefit.
 

Throckmorton

Lifer
Aug 23, 2007
16,829
3
0
No one is saying Republicans who voted against the stimulus should turn away their share.

THey are saying the Republicans who voted against it shouldn't by hypocrites by taking credit, one minute saying 'it won't create any jobs' voting no, and the next saying 'I got you all this money'.

When they show up at ribbon cutting ceremoies for stimulus projects implying it was their doing without any word how they opposed it, that's not the most honest.

Exactly. Also, they're going to the ribbon cuttings while at the same time demonizing stimulus as the destruction of America, arguing that stimulus doesn't work, etc. Well if it doesn't work, why do they want the money?
 

Slew Foot

Lifer
Sep 22, 2005
12,379
96
86
Exactly. Also, they're going to the ribbon cuttings while at the same time demonizing stimulus as the destruction of America, arguing that stimulus doesn't work, etc. Well if it doesn't work, why do they want the money?


They didnt want to pay for it, but if youre going to force them to pay for it, they might as well accept it.
 
Oct 27, 2007
17,009
5
0
There is no hypocrisy here. Despite their personal votes the money was going to be spent. No sense it turning it down if it's just going to go somewhere else. They did what was best for their constituency.
 

Throckmorton

Lifer
Aug 23, 2007
16,829
3
0
They didnt want to pay for it, but if youre going to force them to pay for it, they might as well accept it.

Why even accept the money if it doesn't create jobs and doesn't stimulate the economy? Going into a socialist pact with the Leninist president on a mission to destroy America is a hell of a price to pay for something useless!
 

woolfe9999

Diamond Member
Mar 28, 2005
7,153
0
0
THey are saying the Republicans who voted against it shouldn't by hypocrites by taking credit, one minute saying 'it won't create any jobs' voting no, and the next saying 'I got you all this money'.

This is the real rub. Several of these repubs have said that the stimulus would "create NO jobs" and have touted specific projects, explicitly stating that the projects would create jobs in their districts.

- wolf
 

classy

Lifer
Oct 12, 1999
15,219
1
81
There is no hypocrisy here. Despite their personal votes the money was going to be spent. No sense it turning it down if it's just going to go somewhere else. They did what was best for their constituency.

Hmmm.....when they voted no, they said they were doing what was best for their constituency. So which one was the truth and which one is the lie?
 

Jiggz

Diamond Member
Mar 10, 2001
4,329
0
76
This is the real rub. Several of these repubs have said that the stimulus would "create NO jobs" and have touted specific projects, explicitly stating that the projects would create jobs in their districts.

- wolf

According to the WH, the stimulus created and saved jobs! Those GOP's are just full of it and would not accept the truth! Yup! It created jobs and was so darn good that we have to pass another job bill for this year in the amount of $150B. And I bet you this second job or stimulus bill will also create and save jobs and we'll have another one next year, 2011! Hoooyaaah! The idiocy just continues on.
 
Oct 27, 2007
17,009
5
0
Hmmm.....when they voted no, they said they were doing what was best for their constituency. So which one was the truth and which one is the lie?
That doesn't matter. They may have been right that if the bill didn't go through that it would have been better for their constituency, we'll never know. But after the bill is passed and there are only two options (take the money or leave it) then it's obvious which is better for the constituency - the money is spent, the only question is where. This isn't complicated stuff.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,709
6,266
126
That doesn't matter. They may have been right that if the bill didn't go through that it would have been better for their constituency, we'll never know. But after the bill is passed and there are only two options (take the money or leave it) then it's obvious which is better for the constituency - the money is spent, the only question is where. This isn't complicated stuff.

Voting against it for a reason, then taking Credit for it claiming a thing that contradicts the reason you Voted against it is the problem.
 

Ozoned

Diamond Member
Mar 22, 2004
5,578
0
0
What kind of jackass thinks that politicians operate from a position of principle?
 

JEDIYoda

Lifer
Jul 13, 2005
33,986
3,321
126
yeah yeah yeah

Yet another purely partisan-motivated attack.

What will MSNBC's new topic be next week?

hahahah chubby you need to speak english...you can`t possibly contribute to this thread if you are not speaking english...lol