Reasonable Doubt

Senior member
Nov 18, 2009
698
2
81
jyUorppr5uvJm.png
 

Ruptga

Lifer
Aug 3, 2006
10,246
207
106
I was also beat to it, but it's a pretty straightforward algebra problem, and WolframAlpha would have no problem figuring it out if you couldn't be bothered to do the math.
 

MagnusTheBrewer

IN MEMORIAM
Jun 19, 2004
24,122
1,594
126
I was also beat to it, but it's a pretty straightforward algebra problem, and WolframAlpha would have no problem figuring it out if you couldn't be bothered to do the math.

You have to set it up first which is the difficult part. Solving problems is never hard when you understand the relationship.
 

brianmanahan

Lifer
Sep 2, 2006
24,634
6,016
136
cat + bunny = 10
dog + bunny = 20
dog + cat = 24

dog + (10 - bunny) = 24
dog = bunny + 14

(bunny + 14) + bunny = 20
2*bunny = 6
bunny = 3

dog = 17
cat = 7

17 + 7 + 3 = 27
 

brianmanahan

Lifer
Sep 2, 2006
24,634
6,016
136
i could have probably solved that a lot easier w/ linear algebra

too bad i forget most of it :(
 

MagnusTheBrewer

IN MEMORIAM
Jun 19, 2004
24,122
1,594
126
cat + bunny = 10
dog + bunny = 20
dog + cat = 24

dog + (10 - bunny) = 24
dog = bunny + 14

(bunny + 14) + bunny = 20
2*bunny = 6
bunny = 3

dog = 17
cat = 7

17 + 7 + 3 = 27

I took a different route.
cat + dog + 2 bunnies = 30
30 - (cat + dog) = 6 = 2 bunnies
bunny + cat + dog = 27
 

Ruptga

Lifer
Aug 3, 2006
10,246
207
106

brainhulk

Diamond Member
Sep 14, 2007
9,376
454
126
Its a clock, notice how the hand never moves . The animals think it's a scale. They are each verbalizing what they think they see. But when the ? Comes up, the dog thinks to himself ? Kg
 

MagnusTheBrewer

IN MEMORIAM
Jun 19, 2004
24,122
1,594
126
That's generally true, but not in the case of WolframAlpha.
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=a+b=10,+b+c=20,+a+c=24+find+a+b+c

All you have to do is enter the relationships in terms that it can understand, you don't have to know anything about how it's solved, for the most part.

Abstract thinking is the difficulty I'm talking about. It's simple to you because you've learned and practiced to think that way. To put it another way, have you ever observed the frustration older folks who have never used a smartphone have trying to do a simple (to you) task?

One of my biggest frustrations in studying programming is how much Universities expect students to have internalized and never speak about basic relationships. Math isn't taught that way. Identities and relationships are clearly explained and students aren't expected to have 'picked it up' elsewhere. I call it the secret handshake conspiracy.
 

Ruptga

Lifer
Aug 3, 2006
10,246
207
106
Oh, yeah I see what you're saying. I looked at the picture and instantly knew that the animals could be treated as variables, etc.

I'm actually a freshman in a programming program right now. At the moment, this is my bible. MST's CS program doesn't assume that its students know much of anything, as it says there on the main page.
 

yhelothar

Lifer
Dec 11, 2002
18,409
39
91
Pretty easy to see that the cat weighs 4kg more than the bunny right off the bat.

Then you just need two numbers that differ by 4 that add up to 10, which is 7 and 3 for the cat and rabbit, respectively, which makes the dog weigh 17. 17+7+3=27.
 

DrPizza

Administrator Elite Member Goat Whisperer
Mar 5, 2001
49,601
167
111
www.slatebrookfarm.com
Add all three lines up.
2cat+2dog+2bunny=10+20+24=54
cat+dog+bunny=27

None of this substitution jibba jabba.
Yep, that was the first way I noticed when looking at the pics. Add the first 3 pics together, divide by 2. It's a great problem to use in common core algebra.

It also illustrates a new method, which I would refer to as think first before jumping into some rote method you learned. Using a similar problem, you can design a system with no unique solution for the individual weights, but which has a solution for the sum.
 
Last edited: