solid state hard drives?

MidNiteMysT

Senior member
May 23, 2005
409
1
0
what do you guys think of solid state hard drives instead of these hard drives with moving parts that break down faster and arent as fast. solid state like those usb drives as a hard drive would be awesome. just need to make a standard so you can connect it direct to the mobo. i think thats the future of hard drives as soon as we can pack more gigabytes into a smaller space. i know it woud be really hard to get the big capacity such as 300gb, but maybe 70gb for a OS drive and use the other type of hard drive for other types. Think it sounds good, or problems with it?
 

stevty2889

Diamond Member
Dec 13, 2003
7,036
8
81
The main problem right now with solid state hard drives is just the price. They are extremely expensive, but like you said, no moving parts, and they are a good bit faster. They already exist in case you didn't know, but I saw one that was like 40gb for $12,000..eventualy as technology advances, they will become common place, and affordable.
 

alimoalem

Diamond Member
Sep 22, 2005
4,025
0
0
Originally posted by: stevty2889
I saw one that was like 40gb for $12,000..eventualy as technology advances, they will become common place, and affordable.

as everything else does. weren't dvd-burners $3000 or so when they first came out?
 

HiME

Senior member
Jan 30, 2006
209
0
76
too expansive, take an example would be the Gigabyte i-ram. currently they're still using ram as storage, it's not reliable but it's good enough for an OS.

well, hard drives are a lot more reliable if you take a closer look, they are still growing faster. we all know that nomatter if it's a solid state or moving parts, it still have their life spin limit.
 

fatpat268

Diamond Member
Jan 14, 2006
5,853
0
71
Another problem with solid state is that memory chips wear out after a few million transfers.
While it may sound like a lot, you'd actually reach that goal pretty quickly if you used the solid state disk as your OS disk.

If they fix that problem, then the technology could hit the general public. Until then... I wouldn't count on it.
 

Brentx

Senior member
Jun 15, 2005
350
0
0
Originally posted by: fatpat268
Another problem with solid state is that memory chips wear out after a few million transfers.
While it may sound like a lot, you'd actually reach that goal pretty quickly if you used the solid state disk as your OS disk.

If they fix that problem, then the technology could hit the general public. Until then... I wouldn't count on it.


Unless they come out with a technology using our current RAM, like the Gigabyte iRam. he only problem with the iRam is that it holds around 4GB Max. Imagine if they came out with a solution that could use 32GB. But then again, that would probably be around $5000-$10000 by the time you end up purchasing all the RAM needed for that configuration.

There are a couple companies out there that make solid state storage, and they are not limited to a write capacity like USB thumb drives. The units are extremly expensive, and are only meant to be used in the server world with large databases that have 300+ accesses constantly. Imaging using one of those in your basement for a NAS :p
 

Pariah

Elite Member
Apr 16, 2000
7,357
20
81
People have been thinking SS hard drives are the future for over a decade, and we are no closer now to that than we were back then. Solid state drives as we think of them today, will likely never be mainstream, because by the time they become practical (which I doubt they ever will, certainly not for mass storage) something better will probably have surfaced to replace the standard winchester design of today.

Also keep in mind that there are a whole slew of different types of solid state drives with different characteristics and performance levels. Those USB thumb drives, for example, would make awful hard drive replacements, as their performance level is well below that of a standard SATA hard drive.
 

bunnyfubbles

Lifer
Sep 3, 2001
12,248
3
0
I remember reading up on technologies such as IBM's MRAM and what not; but most of it, while exciting, just isn't going to be ready any time soon - and by ready I mean to bump current HDDs as LCDs have for CRTs. Heck, I think we'll have an alternative/replacement for LCDs before we have realistic alternatives to our harddrives.
 

letdown427

Golden Member
Jan 3, 2006
1,594
1
0
We seem to be about to be offered a mix of the two though. As in, a normal hard drive, with a reasonably sized chunk of flash memory acting as a sort of buffer. Not just like a 16mb buffer, as we have now, but a much bigger slab of flash memory to store most used files etc for quick loading and so on.

Can't remember where I read about them though , hybrid drives, hmm, I'm sure Google will know.
 

PhoenixOrion

Diamond Member
May 4, 2004
4,312
0
0
Originally posted by: letdown427
We seem to be about to be offered a mix of the two though. As in, a normal hard drive, with a reasonably sized chunk of flash memory acting as a sort of buffer. Not just like a 16mb buffer, as we have now, but a much bigger slab of flash memory to store most used files etc for quick loading and so on.

Can't remember where I read about them though , hybrid drives, hmm, I'm sure Google will know.

Robson

 

MidNiteMysT

Senior member
May 23, 2005
409
1
0
i guess we wont be using this technology for a long time. it would have been really nice though. everything you do on the computer would be so much faster now that your transfer speed is ridiculous. i guess its just a good dream for now, the raptor will just have to do for now.
 

ValuedCustomer

Senior member
May 5, 2004
759
0
0
Originally posted by: Pariah
People have been thinking SS hard drives are the future for over a decade, and we are no closer now to that than we were back then.
pfft. compare the SS technology 10 years ago to the SS technology of today then get back w/ us about how nothing's changed. I'm not saying your overall thesis is necessarily wrong but to say nothing's changed is very wrong.



 

piasabird

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
17,168
60
91
There have been some manufacturers coming out with about 1-2 gig of solid state storage using RAM. May not seem like much but if you could use that as a buffer some programs would run a lot faster. It might be possible to approach the speed of Cache Memory whith PCI-E and a small solid state device.
 

Ika

Lifer
Mar 22, 2006
14,264
3
81
solid state looks like it can develop to be a breakthrough technology (as used in computer hard drives). Samsung has a 32gb memory chip in development... price? ~$8000...

in any case, though, solid state is here to stay... and possibly there to break new ground.
 

GrammatonJP

Golden Member
Feb 16, 2006
1,245
0
0
DDR Drive is paper launch.. plus you can't move it to another PC if needed, since you need to disconnect the power and there isn't onboard battery...

Samsungs Solid state are shipping already.. 32 gb was around 1k not 8000
 

Pariah

Elite Member
Apr 16, 2000
7,357
20
81
Originally posted by: ValuedCustomer
Originally posted by: Pariah
People have been thinking SS hard drives are the future for over a decade, and we are no closer now to that than we were back then.
pfft. compare the SS technology 10 years ago to the SS technology of today then get back w/ us about how nothing's changed. I'm not saying your overall thesis is necessarily wrong but to say nothing's changed is very wrong.

I didn't say nothing has changed, I said it is no closer to being practical than it was back then. If we were still using 3600RPM 500MB hard drives today, then SS would be well on its way to being mainstream. SS technology has certainly improved, but so has the technology of the hard drives it's been rumoured to replace. Though solid state drives have dropped considerably in price, I bet you standard hard drives have dropped more over the same period of time when comparing price per MB. When a sub $500 32+GB nonvolatile ram drive using a standard HD interface becomes available let me know, and we can revisit the SS drives are no more practical now than they were back then comment.
 

Pariah

Elite Member
Apr 16, 2000
7,357
20
81
Originally posted by: GrammatonJP
DDR Drive is paper launch.. plus you can't move it to another PC if needed, since you need to disconnect the power and there isn't onboard battery...

Samsungs Solid state are shipping already.. 32 gb was around 1k not 8000

Samsung unveils 32GB Flash hard drive, March 22, 2006

"Based on the company's own 50nm architecture and 3D transistor structure, the drive uses 16 2GB chips and is promised for production later this year."

How is Samsung shipping a product that hasn't gone into production yet?
 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,795
84
91
magnetic will still be way cheaper for a long time. flash mem,u gotta figure out how to keep track of wear and tear and that can't be fun.
 

ValuedCustomer

Senior member
May 5, 2004
759
0
0
a guy at work has a 16gb model and loves it. I think it's pretty cool too - look, I can't afford one either.. but what's w/ you and the SS hate? you're being really defensive for no reason
 

MidNiteMysT

Senior member
May 23, 2005
409
1
0
yea SS is expensive but you pay a premium price for a premium product. its not a new concept. eventually in time, the price will go down. SS would make an awesome OS hard drive. and thats what i would like to see. because ill use a hard drive for all my other crap.
 

Pariah

Elite Member
Apr 16, 2000
7,357
20
81
Originally posted by: ValuedCustomer
a guy at work has a 16gb model and loves it. I think it's pretty cool too - look, I can't afford one either.. but what's w/ you and the SS hate? you're being really defensive for no reason

Simply responding in kind.