Solaris X enviorment

T3C

Diamond Member
Jun 3, 2003
5,324
0
0
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
CDE's been standard for a while. I just SSH into the solaris machines though.


I have always used SSH also, that is how I learned. Now I am looking to be a little lazier lol
 

Sunner

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
11,641
0
76
On the rare occasion that I actually use a GUI on Solaris, it tends to be CDE.
Too lazy to install something else for the few times I use it, and Gnome isn't exactly speedy on an Ultra5. ;)
 

Hyperblaze

Lifer
May 31, 2001
10,027
1
81
I use the Java Desktop Environment (had to install this from scratch). Also don't mind using CDE.

What I didn't really like about Java Desktop Environment is that it just installed the files, no compiling needed. At first you might think this is a bad idea but I would rather a desktop which is compiled for my processor, which it wasn't. So there is no telling how stable the environment is.

edit: I must not be awake yet. Java Desktop Environment was already installed by default. I installed KDE from scratch.

I think I am in need of my caffine
 

n0cmonkey

Elite Member
Jun 10, 2001
42,936
1
0
Originally posted by: Hyperblaze
I use the Java Desktop Environment (had to install this from scratch). Also don't mind using CDE.

What I didn't really like about Java Desktop Environment is that it just installed the files, no compiling needed. At first you might think this is a bad idea but I would rather a desktop which is compiled for my processor, which it wasn't. So there is no telling how stable the environment is.

edit: I must not be awake yet. Java Desktop Environment was already installed by default. I installed KDE from scratch.

I think I am in need of my caffine

Compiling it from scratch adds nothing but time. The stability won't be affected.
 

Hyperblaze

Lifer
May 31, 2001
10,027
1
81
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: Hyperblaze
I use the Java Desktop Environment (had to install this from scratch). Also don't mind using CDE.

What I didn't really like about Java Desktop Environment is that it just installed the files, no compiling needed. At first you might think this is a bad idea but I would rather a desktop which is compiled for my processor, which it wasn't. So there is no telling how stable the environment is.

edit: I must not be awake yet. Java Desktop Environment was already installed by default. I installed KDE from scratch.

I think I am in need of my caffine

Compiling it from scratch adds nothing but time. The stability won't be affected.

are you sure? I would think that compiling an application would greatly increase the stability and swiftness of the app.
 

n0cmonkey

Elite Member
Jun 10, 2001
42,936
1
0
Originally posted by: Hyperblaze

are you sure? I would think that compiling an application would greatly increase the stability and swiftness of the app.

If you compile things correctly, it should provide you with the exact same binaries as you've already got. You can mess with the optimizations, but that adds risk. gcc is notoriously iffy when it comes to odd optimizations.
 

TGS

Golden Member
May 3, 2005
1,849
0
0
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: TGS
Bah to CDE, PuTTY accomplishes all I'll even need.

Bah to PuTTy, OpenSSH is where it's at.

It does SSH as well, though typical we just telnet to the boxes on our server floor. It's behind serious security equipment though.
 

n0cmonkey

Elite Member
Jun 10, 2001
42,936
1
0
Originally posted by: TGS
It does SSH as well, though typical we just telnet to the boxes on our server floor. It's behind serious security equipment though.

It does parts of what OpenSSH does. ;) It's fine if you're stuck with an OS that doesn't support SSH natively. :( I use it at work. :(:(

telnetd has recently been removed from OpenBSD. It just doesn't belong on any network.
 

Sunner

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
11,641
0
76
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: TGS
It does SSH as well, though typical we just telnet to the boxes on our server floor. It's behind serious security equipment though.

It does parts of what OpenSSH does. ;) It's fine if you're stuck with an OS that doesn't support SSH natively. :( I use it at work. :(:(

telnetd has recently been removed from OpenBSD. It just doesn't belong on any network.

Agreed.
 

djdrastic

Senior member
Dec 4, 2002
441
0
0
You know the analogy 'If you put a bunch of monkeys in a room , together they might be able to write a shakespear play ? Well I think that mentality was taken when CDE was written

CDE + Solaris 8 = A 'Winning' Combination
 

djdrastic

Senior member
Dec 4, 2002
441
0
0
Originally posted by: Sunner
Originally posted by: Darien
What's wrong with CDE?

I don't think you'll find many people willing to write a novel for free.



Bahahah
I can just imagine it -> The Book Footnote

To My Wife , friends and all those on ATOT Forums who gave me the courage to write this book on the excruciatingly painful CDE interface ....
 

thesix

Member
Jan 23, 2001
133
0
0
Really one thing: Alt-Tab doesn't work the way I want.

Other than that, I am fine with CDE.

Of course, you can use any windows manager you want, as most of them work in Solaris.

I just got the native Nvidia driver installed, JDS is much smoother now.
Although ffor me simpler is better, so I don't use gnome or kde much.

When I need GUI, I use Windows.
 

Sunner

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
11,641
0
76
Looks like $hit, slow, focus on mouseover by default, no good term program, crappy file browser.
Well, that's a start, haven't used it in a while, so I'm bound to remember more if I use it for a little while.
 

Megatomic

Lifer
Nov 9, 2000
20,127
6
81
Originally posted by: midway
CDE makes the baby jesus cry
No doubt. I have to use it on the HP-UX workstations where I work. I've been told some developers have KDE and Gnome running on their personal stations.

<-- Jealous. :(