Originally posted by: Carbonyl
Speilberg is such a fusken hack. Please see Tarkovsky's version, it's way superior.
Originally posted by: Carbonyl
Speilberg is such a fusken hack. Please see Tarkovsky's version, it's way superior.
I do know that, but have no information about the original work. It is similar to Psycho, the original was great, the movie they made a couple years back sucked golf balls through garden hoses.
Originally posted by: isildur
Originally posted by: Carbonyl
Speilberg is such a fusken hack. Please see Tarkovsky's version, it's way superior.
LOL
omg classic
I thought is was a great piece of cinematography.
Originally posted by: Carbonyl
Originally posted by: isildur
Originally posted by: Carbonyl
Speilberg is such a fusken hack. Please see Tarkovsky's version, it's way superior.
LOL
omg classic
I thought so too.
Just like L. Ron Hubbard's Lord of the rings was a hack.![]()
Originally posted by: brxndxn
I thought is was a great piece of cinematography.
That's the kind of hoighty-toity comment that some snub-nosed Hollywood slapdoll would say about a clearly awful movie that has something they try to say is artistic about it...
If anyone ever calls a movie artisic, it just plain means BAD, people!!! You call something artistic when it comes out like sh|t. BTW, my sh|t is art, too.
monkey hate klean
