Engineer
Elite Member
Click me!
First, I'm not a big fan of SS but I highly doubt that much is going to change until the damn thing is in a huge bind, but I find it a huge slap in the face that not only can people who aren't supposed to be hired can gain SS, but they can gain it in only 18 months (didn't notice payout level) while the US citizen must work for 10 years to get it (I know that many get it without working at all, but that's another thread). Am I reading the above wrong or is the agreement just wrong? Your thoughts?
Entitlements: About to become law is an agreement allowing illegal aliens to get Social Security benefits after only 18 months of employment in the U.S., further burdening a system on the brink of collapse.
Surveys have shown that more Americans believe in the existence of unidentified flying objects than in the promise that they'll ever get back what they've put into the Social Security system. It also is against current law for employers knowingly to hire individuals who are in this country illegally.
So it must be somewhat disconcerting for them to find out that about to become law is an agreement signed on June 29, 2004, between the U.S. Commissioner of Social Security and the director general of the Mexican Social Security Institute that allows illegal aliens to collect Social Security benefits if they have as little as 18 months of employment history. U.S. citizens must show 10 years, or 40 quarters of job history, to collect benefits.
The first public copy of the U.S.-Mexico Totalization Agreement has been obtained, and, no, it wasn't on the first page of the New York Times. It was obtained after three years of wrangling and a Freedom of Information Act request by the TREA Senior Citizens League (tscl.org) which represents more than 1 million seniors. And, as the saying goes, the devil is in the details.
The agreement, which awaits President Bush's signature, can take effect without Congress' approval. All the Democratic Congress has to do is nothing. It doesn't have to vote to approve it -- it has only 60 days to disapprove it, which isn't likely because they likely support allowing it to become law.
First, I'm not a big fan of SS but I highly doubt that much is going to change until the damn thing is in a huge bind, but I find it a huge slap in the face that not only can people who aren't supposed to be hired can gain SS, but they can gain it in only 18 months (didn't notice payout level) while the US citizen must work for 10 years to get it (I know that many get it without working at all, but that's another thread). Am I reading the above wrong or is the agreement just wrong? Your thoughts?