RC5 just ended, so to tell you the truth, I really don't know.So who's doing what...[Poll]
Originally posted by: burnedout
RC5 just ended, so to tell you the truth, I really don't know.So who's doing what...[Poll]
My questions:
Which project runs well in the background on a Windows XP/2K/9X desktop? You know, like a service. Something with a stable client. Had 9 P4s and 11 Celeron/PII/PIIIs from work dedicated to RC5.
Which project takes advantage of dual processors? Currently running a dual slot1 866 at home. Have two Acorp boards with two 1 GHz PIIIs and two additional 866 MHz CPUs.
Give me some ideas.
Thanks.
If DF works well with a dialup connection, it might just be exactly what I'm looking for.Originally posted by: Insidious
I run Distributed Folding. We have about 20 folders and could certainly use some help if any of you are so inclined. 😀
(runs great as a service with 2000/XP)
-Sid
SETI is the only one I know is being run as a service ATM. But it has the infamous Outlook bug. So if you're using Outlook for mail, you should test carefully before running SETI. ECCp could easily be run as a service, I think, but I can't recall if anyone has done it yet. Both should be stable clients.Which project runs well in the background on a Windows XP/2K/9X desktop? You know, like a service. Something with a stable client. Had 9 P4s and 11 Celeron/PII/PIIIs from work dedicated to RC5.
I can't think of a project that doesn't, if you run two clients at once. SETI isn't as efficient with two instances, but one SETI with one ECCp, OGR, or other non-memory-intensive client works great!Which project takes advantage of dual processors? Currently running a dual slot1 866 at home. Have two Acorp boards with two 1 GHz PIIIs and two additional 866 MHz CPUs.
SETI is the only one I know is being run as a service ATM
If DF works well with a dialup connection, it might just be exactly what I'm looking for
Originally posted by: Ken_g6
SETI is the only one I know is being run as a service ATM. But it has the infamous Outlook bug. So if you're using Outlook for mail, you should test carefully before running SETI. ECCp could easily be run as a service, I think, but I can't recall if anyone has done it yet. Both should be stable clients.