http://www.nraila.org/News/Rea...Releases.aspx?ID=11588
After reading everything I don't understand why he trying to take leagal action. He supported it at one time, even if some of it was almost ten years ago.
The things that worried me most were the 500% Tax on Guns and ammo, a bill he voted on as a semi-auto weapon ban even though it included other guns that weren't semi; like break action shotguns.
I wish they would define better in the bills what constitutes what, there is too many variables that could be persuaded in court to be legal or illegal. It needs to be clearly defined instead of leaving it up to a judge to determine.
But it seems like all the people in politics like to leave things open, kind of like some of the contracts you have to sign to get a job, encompass everything then determine whether you really meant that later. Seems awfully lazy/sloppy.
After reading everything I don't understand why he trying to take leagal action. He supported it at one time, even if some of it was almost ten years ago.
The things that worried me most were the 500% Tax on Guns and ammo, a bill he voted on as a semi-auto weapon ban even though it included other guns that weren't semi; like break action shotguns.
I wish they would define better in the bills what constitutes what, there is too many variables that could be persuaded in court to be legal or illegal. It needs to be clearly defined instead of leaving it up to a judge to determine.
But it seems like all the people in politics like to leave things open, kind of like some of the contracts you have to sign to get a job, encompass everything then determine whether you really meant that later. Seems awfully lazy/sloppy.
Facebook
Twitter