<< Since when does the presumption of extra-legal specialness by ability to give sympathy, or not, have any substantive meaning beyond one's personal philosophy?
Those who choose not to vote are still citizens no less deserving of all Constitutionally given and protected rights, the same rights which any other voting citizen enjoys. >>
I'm NOT TALKING about extra-legal specialness (whatever the hell that means). I NEVER SAID non-voters are not deserving of protected rights. I'M NOT TALKING about rights, legal issues, the First Amendment or anything else. C'mon UG, I know you're not this dense. I'll say it again, you read way too much into my first post and completely, utterly, and totally misinterpreted my point (I should know what my own point was, after all, I was the one who made it). You captured it well in your statement about my "personal philosophy", because that's what it was, a statement about my personal beliefs, NOT ABOUT ANYTHING LEGALLY RELATED. You seem to be having trouble with that last point, I AM NOT TALKING ABOUT CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.
Do you honestly believe that NOT voting gets anything done? If everyone followed that philosphy, where would we be? Voting is the pretty much the only chance you get to really make a difference in what goes on politically.