So, where is AMD Seattle?

flash-gordon

Member
May 3, 2014
123
34
101
amd-server-roadmap-2014.jpg


DSC_0123-578-80.jpg


It should be on the news by now...
 

Justinbaileyman

Golden Member
Aug 17, 2013
1,980
249
106
Holy crap I cant wait.. what socket will these go in??Please for the love of god dont say G34 cause that socket is so outdated.Anyways I am really into arm right now and am very excited for these. Whats the core count on these babies??
 

Elixer

Lifer
May 7, 2002
10,371
762
126
AMD will launch the new Opteron "Seattle" enterprise CPUs, which integrate up to eight ARM Cortex A-57 64-bit cores, targeting the ultra-dense server market sometime in March-April.

I wonder if they can get some profit form this move ?
 

Vesku

Diamond Member
Aug 25, 2005
3,743
28
86
Well it will be a year from when they said they'd be shipping lots of sample kits April this year, so I'd say we should see actual Seattle servers selling sometime between May and September. This is going off their historical design to shipping performance.
 

DrMrLordX

Lifer
Apr 27, 2000
22,886
12,943
136
That's interesting. It's like AMD has gone all the way back to their old Athlon MP strategy: if you can't beat the competition in the server room, underprice them big time. $171 for an A-series Opteron is far less than what you bay for Broadwell-D which is obviously the toughest competition Intel has in that server segment.

So the chip is cheap, the platform is cheap, the power draw is low . . . TCO is going to be rock-bottom for those things. There's still software costs, but those vary from shop to shop.
 

mrmt

Diamond Member
Aug 18, 2012
3,974
0
76
That's interesting. It's like AMD has gone all the way back to their old Athlon MP strategy: if you can't beat the competition in the server room, underprice them big time. $171 for an A-series Opteron is far less than what you bay for Broadwell-D which is obviously the toughest competition Intel has in that server segment.

Do you think Seattle is good enough to beat the Atom C series?
 

jpiniero

Lifer
Oct 1, 2010
16,781
7,235
136

richaron

Golden Member
Mar 27, 2012
1,357
329
136
I assume the release of ARMv8.1-a at the end of last year helped to delay Seattle.

I've been waiting for a powerful router to serve as NAS/home server but I might just go old school & build it myself. At least with something like this it'll be relatively low power (important for always on where I live), but with enough grunt for a PBX server & PVR backend. A few SATA ports and 10G networks were limiting my choices.
 

DrMrLordX

Lifer
Apr 27, 2000
22,886
12,943
136
I'm not really that optimistic, especially after the SeaMicro debacle.

Honestly, I don't think the SeaMicro situation has anything to do with the performance capabilities of A-series Opterons.


Interesting, though hardly conclusive.

Late, slow, and probably consumers more power than Avoton. AMD has a real winner here.

I will agree that the power consumption will probably be higher on A-series Opteron systems, though AMD is packing 8 cores under the hood which may provide it with a non-trivial advantage in situations where thread handling capability is more important that total throughput. Web servers, stuff like that.

That $199 Broadwell-D is uncomfortably close in price to the A-Series chips, so for AMD's sake, Seattle better show up well in other benches to generate some interest. Seattle really needed to show up months ago. The delays are definitely a problem.
 

mrmt

Diamond Member
Aug 18, 2012
3,974
0
76
I will agree that the power consumption will probably be higher on A-series Opteron systems, though AMD is packing 8 cores under the hood which may provide it with a non-trivial advantage in situations where thread handling capability is more important that total throughput. Web servers, stuff like that.

Avoton also has 8C.