steppinthrax
Diamond Member
$$$
In general, your message here is good but there is some middle ground.
I don't contribute to society (unless you mean paying taxes) but I'm not mooching either. I also refuse to have kids, I want my bloodline to die with me.
post count.
Wealth is not a measure of success.
Happiness is not a measure of success.
True success is to improve the human condition
see sig
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/successful?s=t
The question should be, what is everyone's definition of success. which that definition states its the accomplishments of one's goals. Goals do not require to be moral but has often been associated with being good in nature.
My opinion, a successful person is someone striving for perfection but doesnt ever expect to get there.
A lot of retired people, well at least some, make valuable contribution to the societyThere is definitely some middle ground. As I said in the last paragraph, circumstances differ - for example, if you're retired, society considers you "done" with your working life as a contribution to society. Nothing wrong with that!
Going back to it, Bundy was happy too. I'm not completely sure happiness equates to successTo crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of their women.
Or to be happy.
Going back to it, Bundy was happy too. I'm not completely sure happiness equates to success
Cause he was a killer.So why don't you think Ted Bundy was a successful person?
Success is the fulfillment of some goal. A successful person will feel he or she has fulfilled a satisfying number of his or her personal goals. That's really all there is to it.
When people comment on whether they see another as successful or not they're usually projecting their own personal goals on that person. Or maybe they understand that person's goals and are reflecting on that.
Success is the fulfillment of some goal. A successful person will feel he or she has fulfilled a satisfying number of his or her personal goals. That's really all there is to it.