IAteYourMother
Lifer
Harvard does not give athletic scholarships.
Right, they technically don't. But the general idea is still the same as far as recruiting athletes versus admissions standards.
Harvard does not give athletic scholarships.
Not trying to take away from anything hes done, I really admire his perseverance and talent but I hope this isn't some flash in the pan. We'll see how the rest of the season goes. I also have to wonder how much of his current success is due to defenders just not knowing what to expect out of him.
How lax are the admission standards at Harvard to get in as an athlete? If you were being recruited as an athlete only like Lin
While it's quite possible that 38 points is a complete anomaly (as he never came close to that even in college ball), it does seem to suggest he has the skills to make it as a decent player in the NBA. Even if he does 25 points less per game (yes 25 LESS) from now on but continues with a good number of assists, and keeps turnovers in check, he's gonna be a valuable player.
And the ignorance continues! Harvard did not offer Lin any form or scholarship. Lin graduated high school with a 4.2 GPA and led his team to win a division championship.
How do these university and high school grading systems usually work in the US?And the ignorance continues! Harvard did not offer Lin any form or scholarship. Lin graduated high school with a 4.2 GPA and led his team to win a division championship.
High school.Wasn't it a state championship? I know he led them to the state championship atleast once.
How do these university and high school grading systems usually work in the US?
For example, at my university, the highest possible grade was 4.0, and thus the highest possible GPA was 4.0 as well.
High school.
While it's quite possible that 38 points is a complete anomaly (as he never came close to that even in college ball), it does seem to suggest he has the skills to make it as a decent player in the NBA. Even if he does 25 points less per game (yes 25 LESS) from now on but continues with a good number of assists, and keeps turnovers in check, he's gonna be a valuable player.
How do these university and high school grading systems usually work in the US?
For example, at my university, the highest possible grade was 4.0, and thus the highest possible GPA was 4.0 as well.
High school.
Everyone across the nation is floored by this guy. He's like the next lebron at this rate
D'Antoni's system is excellent, Phil Jackson's triangle system isn't (no one runs that anymore anyways.)
I was going to post some ridiculous al981 quote just to laugh at the ridiculousness of it and then you drop this gem and have me thinking that someone who endorses absurd conspiracy theories isn't the stupidest person in this thread. And that makes me sad, because you're generally one of the better posters around here. But seriously, D'Antoni's system is better than Phil Jackson's? Maybe at the waffle bar. In basketball, it's not even fucking close. I can't even come up with a good comparison because it's so far off base, it doesn't make sense. It's like saying that Tom Brady isn't as good at football as the moon because Poseidon's son was a cyclops.
I just watched the replay of the game on ESPN, and Lin was outstanding. Kobe was sensational in the second half, and Lin not only matched him, he bested him. That's a rare feat. For a while in the fourth, they were just trading buckets back and forth off insane moves and hitting shots that you expect once every four games or so. It was great basketball. It really makes me wonder what's going to happen once Amare and Melo come back. Amare can play with a great point guard; look what he did with Steve Nash. But Melo? I've always had this feeling in my gut that he's completely over-rated, and while this season is hardly a good metric for judging anyone with the compressed schedule and lack of training camps, it's done nothing to dissuade my skepticism about Carmelo Anthony. Maybe he just needs a great point guard to set him up, like he had in Chauncey Billups during his best years. This could make the Knicks a viable team, and I honestly hope it does, because those fans deserve a break after watching their team be awful for such a long time.
I was going to post some ridiculous al981 quote just to laugh at the ridiculousness of it and then you drop this gem and have me thinking that someone who endorses absurd conspiracy theories isn't the stupidest person in this thread. And that makes me sad, because you're generally one of the better posters around here. But seriously, D'Antoni's system is better than Phil Jackson's? Maybe at the waffle bar. In basketball, it's not even fucking close. I can't even come up with a good comparison because it's so far off base, it doesn't make sense. It's like saying that Tom Brady isn't as good at football as the moon because Poseidon's son was a cyclops.
I just watched the replay of the game on ESPN, and Lin was outstanding. Kobe was sensational in the second half, and Lin not only matched him, he bested him. That's a rare feat. For a while in the fourth, they were just trading buckets back and forth off insane moves and hitting shots that you expect once every four games or so. It was great basketball. It really makes me wonder what's going to happen once Amare and Melo come back. Amare can play with a great point guard; look what he did with Steve Nash. But Melo? I've always had this feeling in my gut that he's completely over-rated, and while this season is hardly a good metric for judging anyone with the compressed schedule and lack of training camps, it's done nothing to dissuade my skepticism about Carmelo Anthony. Maybe he just needs a great point guard to set him up, like he had in Chauncey Billups during his best years. This could make the Knicks a viable team, and I honestly hope it does, because those fans deserve a break after watching their team be awful for such a long time.