That's not what my post said. If you want to say that democrats were responsible for a few extra hours of government shutdown due to their willingness to get the debt ceiling hiked the way they wanted it that's fine. The other 99.9% of it was indisputably on the republicans.
Attempting to assign equal blame to the party taking hostages and the party not giving in to the hostage demands is simply revisionist history. What is funny is that the republicans were PROUD to say they were shutting the government down until it turned into a catastrophe. Then they pretend it never happened and they expect to be able to fool gullible people.
You're just like every other person in this country - you care more about the overall policies than you do about the temporary government shutdowns. You would gladly trade a few weeks of government shutdown if it meant a gigantic win for Obamacare, if it meant a gigantic win for increased government spending.
I would gladly trade a government shutdown to get out of this boondoggle of Obamacare and reduced government spending.
Be honest with yourself. Be honest with others. Your ego has grown far too large.
Your post said you fully acknowledge that the next round is the Dems demanding increased spending over the threat of a shut-down. We will see when the day comes, do the Dems cave on increased spending in order to avert a shut-down? If they do not, then you are proven wrong. If they do cave, at best it proves that the Dems felt that within the confines of this unique situation a shutdown was worse for their overall intentions with the future direction of this government, than fighting through a shutdown for increasing spending.
For you to be right, if the Democrats are so saintly and gracious and what-not - they would never shut down a government over a policy dispute... why then did you specifically say the Dems made sure this next fight was so close so they could get what they want. If they would never shut down the government, then they have zero bargaining power, Republicans will demand spending levels stay where they are and the Dems will be forced to agree.
But that
is a contradiction to the scenario you acknowledged they purposefully created. And it also means they are capable of and willing to use a shut-down to enforce their agenda. You cannot separate out political gamesmanship from any of these situations.
Or to be put in simpler terms, you are a political hack.
At least have the decency to acknowledge what we all know.
But in the spirit of making this a better world, how about this, would you agree with this statement?
The Democrats did not feel a shut-down was a threat to their control over government during the last round.