So, Kevin Federline is threatening to release a sex tape...

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

moshquerade

No Lifer
Nov 1, 2001
61,504
12
56
Originally posted by: jimbob200521
"Britney, 24, fears the raunchy footage will destroy her wholesome image unless she caves in to his demands for a £16million payoff and custody of their children Sean Preston, one, and Jayden James, eight weeks."

Link to Story
I really wouldn't want to see his messy overly hairy bits anyway.

 

MaxDepth

Diamond Member
Jun 12, 2001
8,757
43
91
Originally posted by: judasmachine
Originally posted by: mugs
"They did nothing all day but have sex?and play the odd game of chess. "

I don't believe that for a second.

I'm sure it's the 'chess' where you have to say, "king me."

I believe it is a typo.

It should read:
"They did nothing all day but have sex?and play the odd game of chest. ".
 

MichaelD

Lifer
Jan 16, 2001
31,528
3
76
1. Her prenup was written by $1K/hour attorneys...probably about 23 of them. It will hold up in any court.

2. That's why he's got the tape. He's a scumbag dirtball, but he's not stupid.

3. Of course he's got copies.

4. The OTHER divorce agreement will state "Federline gets $15 million and the tape will never be made public."

Will it leak out afterwards? Maybe. But he'll get paid.
 

I Saw OJ

Diamond Member
Dec 13, 2004
4,923
2
76
Originally posted by: thehstrybean
Britney Spears may be the dumbest thing on planet earth, but as said above, she has a great rack, so I'd watch it...

:evil:

Damn right, pre or post babies I'm watching that video.
 

IceBergSLiM

Lifer
Jul 11, 2000
29,932
3
81
oh man he played the fvck out of her. man oh man. im sure it wasn't too difficult to the pull the wool over her eyes she isnt the smartest. I say good for him. Finally a man is set to make some financial gain during a divorce.
 

Maxspeed996

Senior member
Dec 9, 2005
848
0
0
Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
oh man he played the fvck out of her. man oh man. im sure it wasn't too difficult to the pull the wool over her eyes she isnt the smartest. I say good for him. Finally a man is set to make some financial gain during a divorce.

Yea , squeeze her for the loot.....then give her the original , and then secretly sell the copys for millions more.....
Video will be out before this weekend.
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: DonVito

This is incorrect. Judges do indeed throw out some pre-nups, but there are many ironclad ones that have been tested in court and survived. I have to assume she would have used a stellar attorney, and that her pre-nup is probably as good as they get.

Also, as to your first point, no, he would not be entitled to half of her "estate" (this term really only applies after she's dead). California is a community-property state, and, absent a pre-nup, he would be entitled to half of the money she made during their marriage. Since, as I recall, she really hasn't toured or released new music during their marriage, this would likely be a fairly small percentage of her net worth.

Out of curiousity, for what reasons are pre-nups normally tossed out?

Typically the spouse (usually the wife, here the husband) claims he or she was coerced or subjected to undue influence, or didn't understand what he or she was signing. Some attorneys actually videotape the signing and ask the wife a series of questions on tape to protect against this. I have to imagine she would have had some killer lawyers, and wouldn't be at all surprised if he'd signed it on videotape.
 

Stuxnet

Diamond Member
Jun 16, 2005
8,392
1
0
Originally posted by: Balt
Why would he even pretend to want the kids? Hoping to bargain for more money if he gives up custody?

Yes. That's exactly how divorces work. You shoot for the moon hoping you'll get something very specific. Everything else is just a bargaining chip.

Sad.

 

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,769
19
81
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: DonVito

This is incorrect. Judges do indeed throw out some pre-nups, but there are many ironclad ones that have been tested in court and survived. I have to assume she would have used a stellar attorney, and that her pre-nup is probably as good as they get.

Also, as to your first point, no, he would not be entitled to half of her "estate" (this term really only applies after she's dead). California is a community-property state, and, absent a pre-nup, he would be entitled to half of the money she made during their marriage. Since, as I recall, she really hasn't toured or released new music during their marriage, this would likely be a fairly small percentage of her net worth.

Out of curiousity, for what reasons are pre-nups normally tossed out?

Typically the spouse (usually the wife, here the husband) claims he or she was coerced or subjected to undue influence, or didn't understand what he or she was signing. Some attorneys actually videotape the signing and ask the wife a series of questions on tape to protect against this. I have to imagine she would have had some killer lawyers, and wouldn't be at all surprised if he'd signed it on videotape.

Probably even had to go to a councelor to explain what will happen in the event of a divorce to his livelihood.
 

timosyy

Golden Member
Dec 19, 2003
1,822
0
0
Originally posted by: mpitts
Originally posted by: timosyy
Eh.. They were married. Married people have sex. A lot.

I'm just guessing that you are not currently and have never been married.. :D

Haha... I meant within the first couple weeks or so, ie. when this tape was filmed :p.
 

Ilmater

Diamond Member
Jun 13, 2002
7,516
1
0
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Why should he have to extort money from her? Shouldn't he be entitled to half her estate, plus alimony?

Edit: I should add, I'm pretty sure judges throw out pre-nups all the time. There's no such thing as an iron clad pre-nup.
He is only entitled to half of what she made while they were married. Also, understand that it's much harder to throw out a pre-nup when the marriage lasted such a short time. Less has changed since they got married than in a marriage where, say, someone suddenly became a multi-millionaire when they were making $30k/yr before.
Originally posted by: Balt
Assuming this source is reliable and not just a tabloid:

Why would he even pretend to want the kids? Hoping to bargain for more money if he gives up custody?
He wants the kids because that entitles him to alimony payments... he gets none now.
 

Miramonti

Lifer
Aug 26, 2000
28,653
100
106
Since a tape is bound to surface sooner or later, she should release one of her own first. This way Kflop gets nothing.
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
Originally posted by: wicka
I can't believe she is pondering giving up her kids to maintain a non-existent image.

Who says she is doing any such thing? I'd rather have my children raised by wolves than Kevin Federline.
 

imported_wicka

Senior member
May 7, 2006
418
0
0
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: wicka
I can't believe she is pondering giving up her kids to maintain a non-existent image.

Who says she is doing any such thing? I'd rather have my children raised by wolves than Kevin Federline.

Man, I'm sick and tired of all these people saying "I'd rather have my children be raised by wolves than..." Until you've been raised by wolves don't pass judgment. It's not the cakewalk you think it is. Trust me.
 

Leros

Lifer
Jul 11, 2004
21,867
7
81
Let's pretend he cares about the kids...

Who would be a better parent KFed or Britney? I'm voting KFed.
 

pkme2

Diamond Member
Sep 30, 2005
3,896
0
0
A mother's maternal instincts always wins out.

KF is just another a$$hole and him trying to extort money and favors is a$$inine too.

His interests has nothing to do with his kids, but himself.

It's sad because Britney will never be what she was, and should only be concerned as to what she is best for her and her kids now.

Those tapes will never be hidden, its worth too much and somehow they will see the light of day, especially with copies appearing out of the thin air.

Federline is a real scvmbag in my book and his kids are better off without him.
 

meltdown75

Lifer
Nov 17, 2004
37,548
7
81
Originally posted by: Leros
Let's pretend he cares about the kids...

Who would be a better parent KFed or Britney? I'm voting KFed.
Driving lessons begin earlier with Britney. I'm picking her.