U R crazy if your car doesn't call for it.
Doh. Forgot to put that it does. 91 required, 93 recommended
U R crazy if your car doesn't call for it.
So you put 89 is shitty import engines? That's win!
Half the board here will claim otherwise, try it yourself, run at least a couple tanks of 89 and see if you get farther on it. I never run one of my cars on 87, 87 is for rentals and shitty domestic engines.
Ugh, I wish that people would learn how this stuff works.
An engine that isn't designed to benefit from premium will get ZERO advantages from it.
Isnt that what i'm attempting to do... by asking the question, is learn how this works? Ass hole.
Isnt that what i'm attempting to do... by asking the question, is learn how this works? Ass hole.
So would the consensus on my vehicle then be not to bother? just stating that "an engine that doesnt call for it wont benefit from it" doesnt tell me anything since, I dont know if mine would call for it or not, the car is 11 years old, it's not like i bought it from the dealer in 1999 brand new for $30,000 and the guy TOLD me what kind of gas to put in it. I'm just trying to find out from people who obviously know more than I do.
God, do you slam EVERYONE that asks you a question for not already knowing the answer?
EDIT: I googled a bit and found 3 separate pages that said 91 octane is recommended for the 1997 - 2001 V6 model Camry. Interesting.
Whats weird is Lexus requires Premium in all of its cars but the same engine in a toyota labeled car can run on regular. hmmm
My mom has been putting the 89 in her Lexus ES300 for a while now. Premium is getting too expensive here.
Where is "here" because premium is usually only a few cents more. I don't even know why there is an 89. Get crap or get premium.
Do you have a sticker on the inside of your fuel door that indicates what you should be running? Some cars do.
Is it true that if you always use a higher octane fuel, suddenly switching to lower octane can make it run rougher than if you always used a lower octane fuel? I've heard that but I don't know if it's true.
My forester likes 87, I give it 87. (NA engine)
My previous car, Chrysler 300m Liked 89, but, could handle 87 just fine since the ECU was smart enough to play with the compression (never once had an issue with knocking). Mileage was the same with 87 and 89, but, 89 could accelerate ever so slightly better.
I miss the engine in that car, but, the last year I had it, it spent about 1/5 of the time in the shop, and it got crap milage (I averaged 19 in my mix of city/highway, I average 24-25 in the forester with the same mix)
Yes, because it takes time for the ECU to adjust to the fuel change.
Same way that if you're used to drinking Mountain Dew all the time, when you stop for a couple days you feel slow and tired. It takes you body time to recalibrate.
You know, I've never looked that close at the inside of the fuel door, i just unscrew the cap, put it in the little cradle in the fuel door and just turn around and grab the nozzle, i shall look when i get off work today to see. I want to say there isnt one, but i'm not 100%. i'm also going to look around at home for my owner's manual for my car, it might be in my glove box, but I dont think that is where it ended up after the accident and the car was an inch from being totaled.
Yeah I ran across that in my googling, read the whole first part to get an idea of it, and it is interesting, I mean, i'm not going to lie, I was under the impression that i'm sure 90% of the population is, higher octane meant more POWER, but its not the case at all. This thread has been quite enlightening.
Yep, it doesn't necessarily mean more power, but it can allow the engine to make more power (safely). I run 93 in both my cars - the MR2 can run on 91, but I'm running higher boost so I like the safety net. The Subaru has a tune specifically for 93- I can flash to a 91 tune, but I'll lose a few ponies. I like ponies too much to give them away.![]()
