So i get a call from a LA Lawyer today . . . Would i like to sue ATi?

[Nirach]

Originally posted by: Creig

Originally posted by: Crusader
With a middleman like NV has, they can point fingers back and forth forever.. thats what happens in suits.
ATI has no such luxury.. and the lawyers know this will be settled rather fast and easy because of such damning evidence with no where to turn.

Do you have a problem with reading comprehension? Nvidia themselves advertised functions of their GPU that don't work (WMV9 decode acceleration). It doesn't matter WHAT manufacturer put them on a card because the core itself was defective. Here, let me simply it as much as possible for you:



Nvidia advertised on their website that their NV40 & NV45 cores would accelerate WMV9 decoding, which turned out to be UNTRUE.



There. Is that plain enough for you? Card manufactuers have nothing to do with it. This one is ALL Nvidia.

You might aswell give up trying to argue with Crusader. It's pretty apparent that he's the kind of person that has nVidia cards crammed in his backside, and wipes it on ATi manuals, becuase he's that pathetic that it makes him feel better.

You could argue with him until you were blue in the face and your fingers fell off, but he'd still reply with the same garbage, over and over again.

The only other people I've EVER seen do this are thirteen and fourteen years old.

They also happen to be completely undereducated in the field they were trying to argue.

It seems Crusader is the same, in this respect.

Unless he's secretly a lawyer that works for ATi and knows everything they do inside out, back to front and in Mandarin pig latin.

I assume the Mandarin pig latin idea is true, because his arguments make about the same amount of sense.

 

[akugami]

Nirach, that's an insult to 13 and 14 year olds everywhere.

 

[Nirach]

Originally posted by: akugami
Nirach, that's an insult to 13 and 14 year olds everywhere.

What, asociating them with Crusader, or saying they can't debate with any ability?

 

[akugami]

Originally posted by: Nirach

Originally posted by: akugami
Nirach, that's an insult to 13 and 14 year olds everywhere.

What, asociating them with Crusader, or saying they can't debate with any ability?

Associating them with Crusader. I've seen some pretty intelligent 13 and 14 year olds. At least the 13 and 14 year olds can understand some logic even if more complex logic escapes them.

 

[Nirach]

Originally posted by: akugami

Originally posted by: Nirach

Originally posted by: akugami
Nirach, that's an insult to 13 and 14 year olds everywhere.

What, asociating them with Crusader, or saying they can't debate with any ability?

Associating them with Crusader. I've seen some pretty intelligent 13 and 14 year olds. At least the 13 and 14 year olds can understand some logic even if more complex logic escapes them.

Touché

 

[Creig]

Originally posted by: akugami

Originally posted by: Nirach

Originally posted by: akugami
Nirach, that's an insult to 13 and 14 year olds everywhere.

What, asociating them with Crusader, or saying they can't debate with any ability?

Associating them with Crusader. I've seen some pretty intelligent 13 and 14 year olds. At least the 13 and 14 year olds can understand some logic even if more complex logic escapes them.

If I recall correctly, Anand was 14 when he started Anandtech. And even back then, he was one of the best-spoken, intelligent people (teenage or otherwise) that I'd ever had the pleasure of conversing with.