Zugzwang152
Lifer
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Opera is pretty good, but I haven't used it in a while. I don't care for firefox much.
IE users unite 😛
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Opera is pretty good, but I haven't used it in a while. I don't care for firefox much.
Originally posted by: Zugzwang152
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Opera is pretty good, but I haven't used it in a while. I don't care for firefox much.
IE users unite 😛
Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
btw, my favorite feature with opera so far, hit the reply button, type content, hit tab and hit return, voila.
this is something that never worked for me in firefox or in IE.
😉
Any address that's based on the anandtech domain isn't saved in my address bar.Originally posted by: ActuaryTm
I found the above rather confusing, but if you go into a bit more coherent detail, perhaps others (including myself) could offer a bit of advice.Originally posted by: Howard
My Opera doesn't save anandtech-based URLs in the address bar. Also, some pages don't load properly, and Opera loads very slowly. And it doesn't seem as stable as Opera.
On a side note, have been using Opera since December 2000 (~v 4.x). Excellent application, and a very innovative design team.
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: Zugzwang152
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Opera is pretty good, but I haven't used it in a while. I don't care for firefox much.
IE users unite 😛
You all do that. I'll continue using Mozilla.
Would say this is a problem limited to your own experience. There is a section in the preferences called "History and cache" where one can set the number of addresses visited (up to 10,000). Have never experienced an address issue in any version of Opera. In fact, Opera is the reverse of most other browsers in this repect: if the site explicitly hides address/various toolbars in a specific window, all one has to do is change the view settings, and one can re-enable any of the various bars (very nice when attempting to find a specific URL to a window that is hidden otherwise).Originally posted by: Howard
Any address that's based on the anandtech domain isn't saved in my address bar.
The application itself? It depends on your settings. Saving session state? Opening with windows, or just to the application (no windows) itself? More data. Would say Opera is no slower than any other browser I have used, and in most cases (as an application) loads to a useable state much faster than other browsers. This is in reference to the application, and no page loads; have found Opera significantly faster than any browser in nearly all page loading scenarios.Opera, as a program, is the slowest browser to load up on my machine.
This appears connected to the above mentioned settings issue, and sounds very machine specific. Or user specific. Possibly state the specifications of the machine you are experiencing problems of this nature on? Hardware, and any related software as well.And sometimes when I try to open it, it doesn't open. I then have to open Task Manager and get rid of the multiple instances of Opera running in the background, each one taking over 10MB of memory. (WTF?)
Thanks for taking the time to help me out. I'll start a new post so it's easier to read.Originally posted by: ActuaryTm
Would say this is a problem limited to your own experience. There is a section in the preferences called "History and cache" where one can set the number of addresses visited (up to 10,000). Have never experienced an address issue in any version of Opera. In fact, Opera is the reverse of most other browsers in this repect: if the site explicitly hides address/various toolbars in a specific window, all one has to do is change the view settings, and one can re-enable any of the various bars (very nice when attempting to find a specific URL to a window that is hidden otherwise).Originally posted by: Howard
Any address that's based on the anandtech domain isn't saved in my address bar.The application itself? It depends on your settings. Saving session state? Opening with windows, or just to the application (no windows) itself? More data. Would say Opera is no slower than any other browser I have used, and in most cases (as an application) loads to a useable state much faster than other browsers. This is in reference to the application, and no page loads; have found Opera significantly faster than any browser in nearly all page loading scenarios.Opera, as a program, is the slowest browser to load up on my machine.This appears connected to the above mentioned settings issue, and sounds very machine specific. Or user specific. Possibly state the specifications of the machine you are experiencing problems of this nature on? Hardware, and any related software as well.And sometimes when I try to open it, it doesn't open. I then have to open Task Manager and get rid of the multiple instances of Opera running in the background, each one taking over 10MB of memory. (WTF?)
That is really, really strange. And to be honest, perhaps something not related to Opera but some sort of Spyware/Virus/Malware/Hosts file issue? Really odd. Just to be certain we are speaking of the same concept (and to show it indeed functions in Opera), here is a shot of my address bar expanded downward showing various Anandtech related URLs.Originally posted by: Howard
About the URL memory issue: all URLs are stored correctly EXCEPT *.anandtech.com/* (as you can tell, this really irks me).
Crashing - how often? Weekly, daily, hourly? Which version? At a specific site, or just in general? Have you checked the error log, and glanced through the support section to see if there is a specific issue related to your crashes? Can say it is very rare that I ever experience a crash in Opera (and I leave it on near 24/7). The startup preferences can be changed - as I am certain you are aware of - through the "Start and Exit" tab of the preferences. The rare times I do close Opera (shutdowns, reboots, etc), I have the "Continue from last time" option checked, and startup with 20 to 30 windows only takes at most 1 to 3 seconds. Slightly faster with no saved window mind you, but I prefer to pick up browsing where I left off.I've always set Opera to load without any windows except that of the home page, which is set to google.ca. However, when it crashes, it opens with the previous windows. Of course loading it after it crashes is slower than opening it with just 1 window, but even then, the first time I open it, it definitely takes longer than IE, and I *think* longer than Firefox. I'm not willing to restart and test that right now, though.
That is more than enough of a machine to run Opera without a hindrance at all. For comparison purposes, I run Xp Professional on a 3.4GHz Northwood, with 2GB of PC3200.I am using a: AMD Athlon XP 1800+ (I think), 512MB PC2100 memory, ECS K7S5A motherboard, GF2 Pro, 800BB/JB WD hard drive, using Windows XP.
Originally posted by: Zugzwang152
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: Zugzwang152
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Opera is pretty good, but I haven't used it in a while. I don't care for firefox much.
IE users unite 😛
You all do that. I'll continue using Mozilla.
🙁
Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
well.
i'd been using firefox for quite a while now. from .7 to 1.0PR, and it seemed to get worse as they went along. a lot of extensions i use wouldn't carry over from version to version etc. it was becoming a hassle. i also noticed with version 1.0 that IF you put your laptop in hibernate (instead of shut down) frequently, it would take more and more resources until it just wouldn't respond to java, so that if you hit the "quote" button here at AT for example, the next window wouldn't pop up. i'd have to restart the machine and it would be fine.
Originally posted by: jagec
Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
well.
i'd been using firefox for quite a while now. from .7 to 1.0PR, and it seemed to get worse as they went along. a lot of extensions i use wouldn't carry over from version to version etc. it was becoming a hassle. i also noticed with version 1.0 that IF you put your laptop in hibernate (instead of shut down) frequently, it would take more and more resources until it just wouldn't respond to java, so that if you hit the "quote" button here at AT for example, the next window wouldn't pop up. i'd have to restart the machine and it would be fine.
so why'd you keep upgrading? I'm using .93, 1.0PR didn't work for me.
Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
Originally posted by: jagec
Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
well.
i'd been using firefox for quite a while now. from .7 to 1.0PR, and it seemed to get worse as they went along. a lot of extensions i use wouldn't carry over from version to version etc. it was becoming a hassle. i also noticed with version 1.0 that IF you put your laptop in hibernate (instead of shut down) frequently, it would take more and more resources until it just wouldn't respond to java, so that if you hit the "quote" button here at AT for example, the next window wouldn't pop up. i'd have to restart the machine and it would be fine.
so why'd you keep upgrading? I'm using .93, 1.0PR didn't work for me.
who knows, to get the latest and greatest i guess.
but i like opera, plus i like the fact that most of the features i got in firefox as extensions are just built into opera.
Originally posted by: sniperruff
"OMFG, How COULD you pay for something when firefox is free?"
seriously i'm starting to think FF is pretty much like AIM... if it ain't broke, don't click on that "upgrade now" button...
Originally posted by: pulse8
I :heart: my firefox.
Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
Originally posted by: sniperruff
"OMFG, How COULD you pay for something when firefox is free?"
seriously i'm starting to think FF is pretty much like AIM... if it ain't broke, don't click on that "upgrade now" button...
why buy the latest hardware? why install beta versions of MS's OS?