Yes, there's no doubt that Intel's nomenclature is a mess, and easily the worst of the three big GPU vendors.
I believe there will be some benchmarks that even at default TDP the HD5300 could be very close to HD5000 at 15W TDP.
But once again the naming is misleading, HD5300 at 4-6W TDP could not be even close to 28W TDP HD5100.
bah i can't even understand why they would do this..
Why wouldn't it be one?Is this a genuine question or it has a lot of sarcasm ??
More like 1.5 quarter.Core M is mostly going into tablets. Broadwell will still appear as Core i3/i5/i7, which would be what'd go in your ultrabook. Broadwell-U is about 3 quarters out.
Fair enough, but I honestly think that your purchase decision should not be based on specs alone. This is what reviews are for, although I admit it isn't realistic to expect that from "normal people". But this isn't the case just with things like parts nomenclature. How about whole products like iPhones? I'm very certain most people would be just as good off with a cheap, lower-end phone instead of an expensive $800 one.
i bought an hp envy x2 13", and the truth, I'm really disappointed with the performance of the intel hd 5300 and core m 5y10 is worse than intel hd 4400 and very similar to intel hd 4200.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ntnHlkgtkQ
Damn right, I ended up getting the correct driver from a mobo vendor. That was confusing.The thing thing that is a mess is the "Intel HD" thing, they even need a tool to figureout the driver to download. That needs to stop.
In my testing its slower than HD 4200.
As you'd expect you're highly TDP bound - I've found up to a 50% performance difference from running the 5Y71 at stock settings (4.5W) vs. the cTDP 'up' mode (6W) in one graphics test. Yes seems unintuitive that a 33% increase in power can yield a 50% improvement in performance, but that increase is pretty much all put in to the GPU portion of the SoC where as the initial 4.5W is largely taken up by the CPU and uncore portions.
Since HD 4200 parts have a higher TDP (10.5W) that generally outweighs the architectural and process improvements - even with HD 5300 in 6W mode.
Its still fairly impressive when you consider the power consumption though - Titanfall isn't FAR from being playable at 720p and low detail: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHhzjvirzDE
Iris 5100 is a lot smoother though: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvUPl3GyYmE
Will dig out my HD 4200 test system at some point and do some comparison videos.
Is this a genuine question or it has a lot of sarcasm ??
