Originally posted by: Skoorb
I mean age of mythology..."NEXT, please.":frown:![]()
Originally posted by: DrumminBoy
Just got done playing it, pretty fun. How do you garrison the relics?! and how do you earn those lightning bolt point things??
Originally posted by: Skoorb
I mean age of mythology..."NEXT, please.":frown:![]()
Well i played through the tutorial and then I got to a mission where I had to defend a harbor and suddenly an overwhelming sense of boredom assaulted me. It felt like the same thing I'd done a thousand other times in a thousand other RTS games.Originally posted by: XZeroII
I didn''t like it much. Nice graphics and such, but the gameplay is lacking. It's just another RTS game with no real distinction. There are few units and things advance too quickly. I mainly play skirmish's, and I was in the 4th age in less than 30 minutes (along with the computer) with little confrontation. I liked Empire Earth because of the number of units available. Land, water, air units, that game had it all. AOM just seems to lack content.
Except that war3 centered heavily on the hero unit. HEAVILY. That's why it was not just another lame ass RTS game like the rest (starcraft included).Originally posted by: Czar
doing the same thing over and over again just like in other RTS games?? whats warcraft3 then, when I playd it I was mostly so pleased because they didnt change the gameplay from warcraft3, same thing with a little mix of starcraft gameplay. All RTS games offer the same gameplay for the most part.
Originally posted by: acidvoodoo
Originally posted by: Skoorb
I mean age of mythology..."NEXT, please.":frown:![]()
u suck!![]()
People on AT can get defensive over anything!How do people get this defensive over a game?
that was the "enhanced" bit in the gameplay so it would have something over warcraft3 (a good enhancement), the difference in age of mithology is the god concept, in all the old games gods didnt matter much.Originally posted by: Skoorb
Except that war3 centered heavily on the hero unit. HEAVILY. That's why it was not just another lame ass RTS game like the rest (starcraft included).Originally posted by: Czar
doing the same thing over and over again just like in other RTS games?? whats warcraft3 then, when I playd it I was mostly so pleased because they didnt change the gameplay from warcraft3, same thing with a little mix of starcraft gameplay. All RTS games offer the same gameplay for the most part.
Originally posted by: Skoorb
I mean age of mythology..."NEXT, please.":frown:![]()
Originally posted by: Mani
Originally posted by: acidvoodoo
Originally posted by: Skoorb
I mean age of mythology..."NEXT, please.":frown:![]()
u suck!![]()
How do people get this defensive over a game?
Basically the same? It's hardly the same...same type of game? Yes. The upgrading is totally different (and stupid IMO)...why get rid of all the different civs basically? I think they totally shafted themselves on this one.Originally posted by: datalink7
Originally posted by: Skoorb
I mean age of mythology..."NEXT, please.":frown:![]()
Exactly. I was on the Beta and stopped playing after a little bit because it was basically the same with a little better graphics. But still most of the things I found annoying were in there.
Originally posted by: neomits
I got the full thing today
I like it a lot. The godpowers and mythological creatures are cool.
So far I agree it does seem a bit slower but maybe because I've been playing so much WC3