flexy
Diamond Member
ok,
because we had this discussion today at work. Of course, one guy is very religious and brought the old argument that "BB" (BigBang) must be proof for "God" since BB happened out of nothing.....so "what was before nothing ?" and he argued "God" 🙂
BUT - LETS NOT MAKE THAT A RELIGIOUS THREAD !!! ITS POINTLESS !
I did not argue with the religious guy because it annoys me...and i dont want to argue with "Science" "versus" belief. Thsi doesnt make sense. However - we should recognize that science (or the current status of "what we know") is nothing more than a belief-system either....from that point of view the religious guy definetly had a right to bring his points.
NOW TO THE SCIENCE:
a) is there a (scientific) paradoxon in the assumption there was ONE BB ?
Eg: Creation of matter out of nothing ??I would say yes ?!
I can tell you my thoughts:
The BB theory seems widely known and accepted....however the few (?) people fail to see that the thought of a BB could also imply that the Big Bangs happen again, and again, and again.
The fact that the universe expands, leading to the "knowledge" everything once started at one point (eg: BB) does NOT exclude a theory that "this" universe is only ONE universe in a range of many. (Infinite ??)
In other words: My theory is that big bangs happen (and always happened) ever since. There was no FIRST big bang and therefore also no paradoxon of NOTHING ----> matter gets created.
A universe is born in a (a 🙂 ) Big Bang....it is made of matter, and while the universe is dieing, more and more of the matter gets transferred to anti-matter.
Basically a simultaneos anti-matter universe is CREATED *by* the deduction of matter of the matter universe. These two powers (matter universe, anti-matter universe) balance each other OUT. No energy *IS* created nor destroyed....no "external" power is needed..which would be in compliance with elemental physics. Eg: energy paradoxon, no energy from nothing..which is not possible. (IMHO 🙂
There is a theory that all/most galaxies contain black holes in the centre, which, in my opinion are the ways where the matter gets "sucked" in to be spit out "on the other side"....eg. in the "anti-matter" universe where it is part of the birth/growing process of the "other" universe, Maybe the matter of the "other" universe gets spit out in pulsars.
I dont know.
Cliff notes:
- There was not only ONE big-bang, there are infinite numbers.
- matter is transformed into anti-matter (hypothetical anti-matter universe) and vice versa.
- matter and anti-matter universe balance/feed each other.
- matter and anti-matter equals ZERO - process of creating Big Bangs over and over does not violate the laws of physics.
Thats my OWN theory based on what i know because i cannot accept ONE BB, its just bizarre and abstruse - until someone proofs me that
a) BB means only ONE BB is possible
b) anti-matter is fiction
c) black holes/pulsars are fiction.
The only thing which needed some more explanation is the driving force which keeps the universes going/expanding and "suck each other up"...
because we had this discussion today at work. Of course, one guy is very religious and brought the old argument that "BB" (BigBang) must be proof for "God" since BB happened out of nothing.....so "what was before nothing ?" and he argued "God" 🙂
BUT - LETS NOT MAKE THAT A RELIGIOUS THREAD !!! ITS POINTLESS !
I did not argue with the religious guy because it annoys me...and i dont want to argue with "Science" "versus" belief. Thsi doesnt make sense. However - we should recognize that science (or the current status of "what we know") is nothing more than a belief-system either....from that point of view the religious guy definetly had a right to bring his points.
NOW TO THE SCIENCE:
a) is there a (scientific) paradoxon in the assumption there was ONE BB ?
Eg: Creation of matter out of nothing ??I would say yes ?!
I can tell you my thoughts:
The BB theory seems widely known and accepted....however the few (?) people fail to see that the thought of a BB could also imply that the Big Bangs happen again, and again, and again.
The fact that the universe expands, leading to the "knowledge" everything once started at one point (eg: BB) does NOT exclude a theory that "this" universe is only ONE universe in a range of many. (Infinite ??)
In other words: My theory is that big bangs happen (and always happened) ever since. There was no FIRST big bang and therefore also no paradoxon of NOTHING ----> matter gets created.
A universe is born in a (a 🙂 ) Big Bang....it is made of matter, and while the universe is dieing, more and more of the matter gets transferred to anti-matter.
Basically a simultaneos anti-matter universe is CREATED *by* the deduction of matter of the matter universe. These two powers (matter universe, anti-matter universe) balance each other OUT. No energy *IS* created nor destroyed....no "external" power is needed..which would be in compliance with elemental physics. Eg: energy paradoxon, no energy from nothing..which is not possible. (IMHO 🙂
There is a theory that all/most galaxies contain black holes in the centre, which, in my opinion are the ways where the matter gets "sucked" in to be spit out "on the other side"....eg. in the "anti-matter" universe where it is part of the birth/growing process of the "other" universe, Maybe the matter of the "other" universe gets spit out in pulsars.
I dont know.
Cliff notes:
- There was not only ONE big-bang, there are infinite numbers.
- matter is transformed into anti-matter (hypothetical anti-matter universe) and vice versa.
- matter and anti-matter universe balance/feed each other.
- matter and anti-matter equals ZERO - process of creating Big Bangs over and over does not violate the laws of physics.
Thats my OWN theory based on what i know because i cannot accept ONE BB, its just bizarre and abstruse - until someone proofs me that
a) BB means only ONE BB is possible
b) anti-matter is fiction
c) black holes/pulsars are fiction.
The only thing which needed some more explanation is the driving force which keeps the universes going/expanding and "suck each other up"...