So bored...

[InlineFive]

It's using up the time which is good. My estimated total will be around 10BG. How big is your collection?

 

[NikPreviousAcct]

40GB right now, but adding several gigs per week.

 

[Viper GTS]

I had 80+ GB at one point, left it all in Oregon when I left.

Viper GTS

 

[yankeesfan]

13.3 Megabytes

 

[BRObedoza]

6gb. I really don't listen to every song on all my cd's so i only rip a few songs.

 

[Kalvin00]

~800 MB. Increases slowly.

 

[FrogDog]

About 9GB. It's going to go up big time in the near future though as I just signed up for allofmp3 (which owns).

 

[esun]

I went on a frenzy the other day so now I've got easily 50GB+ of classical music. I usually listen to Internet radio anyway (there are 2-3 good classical stations that are reliable enough for me to just listen to those).

 

[rocadelpunk]

40-45 gigs.


trying to add more hiphop to my collection.

mostly punk and it's various spinoffs.

 

[Tremulant]

Only 2GB and some of it is going to be deleted.

 

[Allio]

I just lost 11GB in a bizarre partition corruption accident. Back up to about 1GB now, reripping CDs and trying to track down the rare stuff on Soulseek 🙁

 

[Anubis]

30GB ~7000 songs

 

[godspeedx]

11.02GB
1437 songs
4 days, 13 hours, 41 minutes, 51 seconds of music

iTunes 🙂

 

[Xionide]

Prob around 11 gb. Mostly techno.

 

[Chaotic42]

I have lots of CDs, but I don't like ripping in Windows and I don't feel like rebooting to Linux.

 

[konakona]

its quality that matters more than quantity!
320kb FLAC here, ~5gb and growing... if i knew any better i would have ripped way more in the past, then again i never enjoyed such nice sounding audio setup back then...

 

[djheater]

Hey that's a good idea, and will keep me occupied for a while. :thumbsup:

 

[Jeff7181]

18.8 GB

 

[J0hnny]

This message board has been sent to the authorities.

 

[Ticks]

16.4 GB, mostly indie/alternative rock. And about 95% legally ripped from my own collection. The other 5 percent i haven't bought YET.

 

[Pepsi90919]

Originally posted by: VanillaH
its quality that matters more than quantity!
320kb FLAC here, ~5gb and growing... if i knew any better i would have ripped way more in the past, then again i never enjoyed such nice sounding audio setup back then...

320kb/sec FLAC contradicts itself

 

[konakona]

Originally posted by: J0hnny
This message board has been sent to the authorities.

lol ripping my own music CDs that i own for my own backup purposes. just one copy and no more, no less. now could you explain how that violates any copyright laws?

 

[J0hnny]

Nah, I don't care. I was just joking.

 

[konakona]

Originally posted by: J0hnny
Nah, I don't care. I was just joking.

hehe we are cool, i am having hard time detecting jokes in others' posts... thats what sleep deprivation does for you!

 

[konakona]

320kb/sec FLAC contradicts itself

erk.. you are right, what was i thinking :roll: what i really meant was that is what i choose in EAC options when i directly compress in a one-step process. to my understanding all lossless codecs should sound identical and the difference only comes in compression time+ratio/decompression cpu utilization.