So apparently Global Warming is to blame for China's snow

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
100,930
18,096
126
Originally posted by: eits
Originally posted by: sdifox
wtf people, global warming leads to loss of moderate weather, replace with extreme weather conditions. Watch The Day after Tomorrow. The science explanation part is not bad.

easily one of the most bullshit movies i've ever seen ever, but he's right.

Pick any Michael Bay movie, I think you will have to concede defeat on the scale of bullshit.
 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,795
84
91
doesn't matter if its true or not.

too many people anyways. buying a prius isn't going to do squat.
 

jjones

Lifer
Oct 9, 2001
15,424
2
0
Must be a slow day for Al and his carbon credits racket. Time to beat the global warming drums again.
 

IGBT

Lifer
Jul 16, 2001
17,976
141
106
..it's all part of the carbon-con. the weather isn't the weather anymore. All designed to inflict guilt to extract revenue.
 

ja1484

Platinum Member
Dec 31, 2007
2,438
2
0
Originally posted by: techs
The current threat from global warming is in changing weather patterns.
Sounds like it is possible that it was an additional factor.


Yes because weather and climate certainly haven't been changing constantly for all time.

:roll:
 

ja1484

Platinum Member
Dec 31, 2007
2,438
2
0
Originally posted by: jagec
Even if you don't believe CO2 measurements which suggest (but do not prove) that this warming period may be worse than previous ones, even if you completely and utterly reject human contributions to climate change, the fact remains that climate change is real, is happening, and will affect weather patterns, growing regions, and water availability in ways which are of the utmost importance to human beings, and plans should be made NOW to deal with this.

Even if you hate the planet and everything on it, out of pure self-interest it behooves us to deal with this problem!


I love how people think we *can* deal with "climate change".

As though we're going to ask the planet nicely to have predictable weather patterns so we can alter our behaviors with predictable results.

Any change we make will have effects just as "profound" (or lack thereof) as the current "climate change" supposedly due to our use of fossil fuels.

Makes much more sense to keep on keepin' on rather than uproot pretty much every economy on the planet by forcing everything on to alternative energy in the next few decades.

Global Warming/Climate Change alarmists = shortsighted + illogical.
 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,795
84
91
well michael chricton is right about one thing. hysterical blindness.

"MICHAEL CRICHTON (closing statement)

There was a time when I worked in a clinic and, uh, one day a young woman came in, she was in her early twenties for a routine checkup and, I said what?s going on with you and she said I?ve just become blind.

And, I said, oh my gosh, really, when did it happen, she said, well just, uh, coming into the clinic, walking up the steps of the clinic I became blind.

And I said, oh, and I?m ? by now I?m looking through the chart and I said, well, has this happened before, she said yes, it?s happened before. I?ve become blind in the past, and, what she had of course was hysterical blindness.

And the characteristic of that, is that, the severity of the symptom is not matched by the emotional response that?s, that?s being presented. Most people would be screaming about that but she was very calm, oh yes, I?m blind again.

And I?m reminded of that whenever I hear, that we?re facing, whether we wanna call it a crisis or not, a significant global event, of, of, of importance where we?re gonna have species lost and so on and so forth, that we can really address this by changing our light bulbs.

Or that we can really make an impact by unplugging our appliances when we?re not using them. It?s very much out of whack. And so if? if it were only gonna do symbolic actions, I would like to suggest a few symbolic actions that right ? might really mean something.

One of them, which is very simple, 99% of the American population doesn?t care, is ban private jets. Nobody needs to fly in them, ban them now. And, and in addition?[APPLAUSE]

?let?s have the NRDC, the, the Sierra Club and Greenpeace make it a rule that all of their, all of their members, cannot fly on private jets, they must get their houses off the grid, they must live in the way that they?re telling everyone else to live.

And if they won?t do that, why should we. And why should we take them seriously. [APPLAUSE]"
http://scottthong.wordpress.co...rming-is-not-a-crisis/

destroying the world! time to fly to europe for vacation..but wait, i bought carbon credits!