• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

So, about this whole 'gigantic butts' thing.

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
d2c6137b110150b9997246ae0e1547298c5cda7967820f73b480bad0eac5fe56.jpg
 
QueBert said:
She could make my penis barf anytime, I could throw up all night like I had an uber serious case of food poisoning if I had the shot with her.


kim-kardashian-booty-2.jpg


YESPLZ!!!
Click to expand...

How in the flying fuck could anyone find that attractive? She's just fat. In a way where you don't even get to say 'but she carries it well.'

You can practically see the dimples in that trashbag of butt blubber through that dress.
 
phucheneh said:
How in the flying fuck could anyone find that attractive? She's just fat. In a way where you don't even get to say 'but she carries it well.'

You can practically see the dimples in that trashbag of butt blubber through that dress.
Click to expand...

lol she's fat? She's definitely not skinny, but fat? She's thick, big difference. Rosie O'Donald is fat, Kim is voluptuous.


Kim-Kardashian-Red-Bikini.jpg


I'm not seeing multiple chins, flabby arms or a FUPA, but if you find her fat I guess I can't argue with your opinion.
 
phucheneh said:
How in the flying fuck could anyone find that attractive? She's just fat. In a way where you don't even get to say 'but she carries it well.'

You can practically see the dimples in that trashbag of butt blubber through that dress.
Click to expand...
Fat? 😀

Giuliana Rancic at the Grammys this year must be right up your alley.
 
Butt:boob ratio should be around 1.2:1 or .8:1, not 2:1.

Kardashian isn't fat, but her ass LOOKS fat because half of it is fake.
 
No, she's fat. You don't get a pass for a BMI in the 'obese' range just because you carry a lot of it in your ass.

(I shouldn't mention that BMI is bullshit, but in her case, she has no muscle so I'd say it's a good yardstick)
 
For me, it just needs to be proportionate. It's all about how it looks together with the legs, the hips, the waist, and the tits.

People say Emma Watson looks like a 12-year-old boy, but her body is quite proportionate for its size.

About the biggest ass I find attractive is Jessica Biel, and I would eat that thing for days if I had the chance.

Kim Kardashian is not attractive.
 
phucheneh said:
How in the flying fuck could anyone find that attractive? She's just fat. In a way where you don't even get to say 'but she carries it well.'
Click to expand...

No, she's not fat. She'd be considered voluptuous and with a more normal ass she'd be pretty attractive to people who like that type. At least until she started talking, but that's a different thread. It's the ass that's fat. She's pretty good about hiding it and making sure it's only shot from certain angles, but when a pap gets the thing full on it will melt your eyes like the Ark of the Covenant.

kimk.png
 
GagHalfrunt said:
No, she's not fat. She'd be considered voluptuous and with a more normal ass she'd be pretty attractive to people who like that type. At least until she started talking, but that's a different thread. It's the ass that's fat. She's pretty good about hiding it and making sure it's only shot from certain angles, but when a pap gets the thing full on it will melt your eyes like the Ark of the Covenant.

kimk.png
Click to expand...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M3EMq1Muo-w
 
phucheneh said:
...I'm really growing weary of it, these giant butts.

Every picture of a supposedly attractive woman is centered on her butt. Her enormous, gigantic butt.

I'm not even sure how women are accomplishing this. I feel like we're on the verge of strange future observations, a la '70's boobs were different, man.'

I'm scared.
Click to expand...

It's good to see men like you, the 1%'ers, sticking up for yourself and acknowledging that your weird. You go man, nothing wrong with being weird.
 
my favorite bible passage.

There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses. 21 So you longed for the lewdness of your youth, when in Egypt your bosom was caressed and your young breasts fondled.
Click to expand...
 
phucheneh said:
How in the flying fuck could anyone find that attractive? She's just fat. In a way where you don't even get to say 'but she carries it well.'

You can practically see the dimples in that trashbag of butt blubber through that dress.
Click to expand...

You're a special kind of stupid, aren't you?
 
phucheneh said:
No, she's fat. You don't get a pass for a BMI in the 'obese' range just because you carry a lot of it in your ass.

(I shouldn't mention that BMI is bullshit, but in her case, she has no muscle so I'd say it's a good yardstick)
Click to expand...

I completly agree with you here. Don't get me wrong, I'd still bang her, but then again I have no self respect.
 
phucheneh said:
I guess I'm stupid.

At least I'm not you; I don't feel the need to beat off to some disgusting skank and her Hefty bag of cellulite.
Click to expand...

Even if I don't agree with you, I respect your opinion. But, if she's fat to you what does that make a Rosie O'Donald or Melissa Mccarthy?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top