• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

So a close friend really screwed up. jail time?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
i may have midded this, but how do/or will the athorities know where she got the booze from? if everyone keeps their mouth shut your friend is in the clear
 
Originally posted by: sao123
Someone. CliffNotes. Please.

a chick he knows bought booze for another chick.
that other chick killed somebody with her car while drunk and is now a turnip
now he wants to know how to get the first chick out of jail time for helping kill the old lady
 
depending on the exact circumstances, she could be equally culpable with the driver for the death, as well as the alcohol to a minor, corruption of a minor, type charges.
 
***THIS IS NOT MEANT AS LEGAL ADVICE, AND DOES NOT ESTABLISH AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP***

It's really a function of your state's laws. In all likelihood she will only be facing a misdemeanor charge for providing alcohol to a minor, which may have collateral consequences for her own drivers license.

In theory she might be civilly culpable (it depends on your state's dram-shop laws, which vary wildly from state to state), and defending that could cost a pretty penny. If your state allows a dram-shop cause of action, this will likely play out as follows:

- Old lady's family sues Lindsay-the driver (and perhaps Lindsay-the-buyer) for wrongful death, loss of consortium

- Old lady's insurance company sues Lindsay-the driver (and perhaps Lindsay-the-buyer) for property damage

- Lindsay-the-driver's insurance company hires her a lawyer. Lawyer answers aforementioned complaints, and (if the Plaintiffs haven't already sued her) cross-claims against Lindsay-the-buyer.

If Lindsay-the-buyer is hit with any of the above, you're talking about attorney fees well into 5 figures, plus the potential of a 6-figure or higher finding of liability. I don't see a reason for her to jump for a lawyer now, but she might want to do some research on local PI defense attorneys in advance, in case the process server comes a-knockin' at some point in the next few years.
 
I love how the legal system always blames everyone up the chain.
If someone goes into McDonalds, buys a Salad which comes with a plastic fork.. and that fork is used to commit a homidicide, is McDonalds to blame?
 
Originally posted by: spacelord
I love how the legal system always blames everyone up the chain.
If someone goes into McDonalds, buys a Salad which comes with a plastic fork.. and that fork is used to commit a homidicide, is McDonalds to blame?


you damn right! That would never happen tho, who buys McDonalds salads? Nasty 😛

 
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Originally posted by: Anubis
bard cant be held responsibble if a patron gets wasted there and then goes off and kills someone in a car,

i see this as no different, the only thing she is guilty of is provideing the booze to a minor
Difference is a bar took _reasonable_ measures to ensure it was following the law, so if you lie to it with a decent fake ID, it should not be held accountable. This person knew that she was breaking the law.

Some say only penalize her with that, but I submit to you this: If you're caught driving drunk you get some fairly mild DUI, right? That's all you get. Now, what if you're driving drunk and kill somebody? It's no longer a simple DUI, but rather vehicular manslaughter (I think). In normal circumstances lindsay would be charged with sale to a minor, but in this one her action was a direct contributor in that minor killing somebody, so the law has to punish her harder.

This is legally speaking, mind you. I think the age of 21 is silly anyway and should be more in line with other laws like marriage/joining the military.

Did the alcohol kill the old woman? Or was it the girl who drank the alcohol and then drove that killed her?

And as you point out "minor" just means "not 21 or older" here. And we hold murders accountable for their actions all the time that are technically minors.

I don't really like this law because it just seems full of holes. My theory is it came into being because the person who is responsible in drunk driving related deaths, the drunk driver, is usually dead. After they die, you have to find some one to blame. Kids are stupid, and they do stupid things when they get behind the wheel of a car....even when they aren't drunk they kill people.

Giving beer to a minor is giving beer to a minor. Make it illegal? Fine. Make its punishment insanely high? Fine. Make its punishment scale depending on the actions of another? Doesn't make much logical sense to me.
 
Originally posted by: jagec
Originally posted by: TechBoyJK
And now Megan hates Lindsay because "she" caused the accident and messed up her best friend.

women + driving = ??? :thumbsdown::thumbsdown:
:thumbsdown:
:thumbsdown:
:thumbsdown:


The person who caused the accident was the girl who drove drunk. End of story.

Fixxed
 
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Skoorby is proud of you. I appreciated it when I was 17-18 and people were buying it for me, but I never bought it for others once I turned 19.[/quote]

This is so true. For some reason, when i turned 21, there was no way in hell that I would supply an underage person even though I used to get it from people all the time. Funny how that works.
 
Originally posted by: DainBramaged
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Skoorby is proud of you. I appreciated it when I was 17-18 and people were buying it for me, but I never bought it for others once I turned 19.

This is so true. For some reason, when i turned 21, there was no way in hell that I would supply an underage person even though I used to get it from people all the time. Funny how that works.[/quote]

i actually rarley got peopel to but it for me however in college i purchased booze for most of one of the freshman dorms, our suite was on the first floor of a 3 story freshman dorm when we were juniors, id come back from class to find envelopes with money and a list in them
 
Originally posted by: jagec
The person who caused the accident was the girl who drove drunk. End of story.
Society does not allow her to drink because she is no likely to be mature to do it responsibly. When someone illegally bought her booze, they assumed much of the responsibility for this girls tragic actions.

This case is going to get ugly for everyone involved - as it should as gross irresponsibility led to the death of an innocent woman.
 
Originally posted by: PingSpike
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Originally posted by: Anubis
bard cant be held responsibble if a patron gets wasted there and then goes off and kills someone in a car,

i see this as no different, the only thing she is guilty of is provideing the booze to a minor
Difference is a bar took _reasonable_ measures to ensure it was following the law, so if you lie to it with a decent fake ID, it should not be held accountable. This person knew that she was breaking the law.

Some say only penalize her with that, but I submit to you this: If you're caught driving drunk you get some fairly mild DUI, right? That's all you get. Now, what if you're driving drunk and kill somebody? It's no longer a simple DUI, but rather vehicular manslaughter (I think). In normal circumstances lindsay would be charged with sale to a minor, but in this one her action was a direct contributor in that minor killing somebody, so the law has to punish her harder.

This is legally speaking, mind you. I think the age of 21 is silly anyway and should be more in line with other laws like marriage/joining the military.

Did the alcohol kill the old woman? Or was it the girl who drank the alcohol and then drove that killed her?

And as you point out "minor" just means "not 21 or older" here. And we hold murders accountable for their actions all the time that are technically minors.

I don't really like this law because it just seems full of holes. My theory is it came into being because the person who is responsible in drunk driving related deaths, the drunk driver, is usually dead. After they die, you have to find some one to blame. Kids are stupid, and they do stupid things when they get behind the wheel of a car....even when they aren't drunk they kill people.

Giving beer to a minor is giving beer to a minor. Make it illegal? Fine. Make its punishment insanely high? Fine. Make its punishment scale depending on the actions of another? Doesn't make much logical sense to me.
Well the whole thing is a mess, but I KNOW I've read stories about people getting in BIG trouble for being the person who provided alcohol when something went wrong.

 
Be supportive to Megan. Do whatever Megan wants you to do in regard to the incident.
 
Originally posted by: Vinney
I believe how it works is that currently your friend Lindsay can be held criminally liable for giving alcohol to someone underage - for which she could already receive jail time (depending on the state - but usually a couple of years) or just be hit with a fine. Lindsay the driver would be responsible for vehicular homicide. However, Lindsay your friend is open to civil liability by the family of the person who died, so she may have to pay a lot more money.
That is how I understand it will play out.

Criminal court = Jail is not likely or will be minimal. Most likely fine/probation.
Civil court = FVCKED. She is liable for the death to some degree and a judgement of $$$ judgement will follow.
 
Originally posted by: sao123
so like are you still with megan?
Someone. CliffNotes. Please.

Not with Lindsay any more. Broke up with Lindsay for at least a year and was on the rocks with her as a friend since then up until I ran into her/my friend Megan. I hadn't seen Megan for a few years, and when I met her I totally fell in love with her on the spot. Lindsay really hates me now because I dumped her and afterwords Lindsay, in an indirect way, told me she loved me and such, I still decided Id rather be with Megan.

Megan rejected me anyhow. I care for both and really haven't fallen out of love with megan. i want to talk to both of them, because of all our friends I've been through the most legal shlt and I could help them out more than anyone, but at the same time, relationships with both girls are (-1) and if I call them up now, i dont know if the drama that comes back to the table is less than what help I bring to the table.

Apparently, the detective is still asking questions, but I think somebody already narced Lindsay for providing the alcohol.

Here's where I'm feeling guilty. I broke up with Lindsay when she was about 20 and I was about 23. Im 24 now, almost 25, but when we were together, I always bought her alcohol to drink at parties, but I would be there with her to drive her home (or at least take her home to me). We were responsible about it, but I cant help but feel now that in an indirect way I'm the one that taught Lindsay it was alright to buy alcohol for minors..........
 
Originally posted by: Chaotic42
Originally posted by: jagec
The person who caused the accident was the girl who drove drunk. End of story.

Quoted for truth.

Bullshit. She supplied alcohol to a minor, which is a criminal offense. If she hadn't done this it is possible that the accident wouldn't have a occured. She can and probably will be charged with manslaughter. Now if a jury convicts her is up in the air. But she will loose hands down in a civil case.
 
how can they prove she supplied the alchohol? Unless she was dumb and admitted it.

Tell us how old the parties involved are.
 
Originally posted by: JeffreyLebowski
Originally posted by: Chaotic42
Originally posted by: jagec
The person who caused the accident was the girl who drove drunk. End of story.

Quoted for truth.

Bullshit. She supplied alcohol to a minor, which is a criminal offense. If she hadn't done this it is possible that the accident wouldn't have a occured. She can and probably will be charged with manslaughter. Now if a jury convicts her is up in the air. But she will loose hands down in a civil case.

Ahem - no offense, but I take it you're not an attorney. There is no basis for a manslaughter charge here, and even the most forward-leaning county attorney wouldn't pursue such a charge. Under your theory, the carmaker, the most recent gas station from which the driver purchased fuel, her mechanic, and a host of other people would also be liable for manslaughter, since if they hadn't enabled her to drive in the first place, this death also would not have occured.

 
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: JeffreyLebowski
Originally posted by: Chaotic42
Originally posted by: jagec
The person who caused the accident was the girl who drove drunk. End of story.

Quoted for truth.

Bullshit. She supplied alcohol to a minor, which is a criminal offense. If she hadn't done this it is possible that the accident wouldn't have a occured. She can and probably will be charged with manslaughter. Now if a jury convicts her is up in the air. But she will loose hands down in a civil case.

Ahem - no offense, but I take it you're not an attorney. There is no basis for a manslaughter charge here, and even the most forward-leaning county attorney wouldn't pursue such a charge.

Hopefully thats the case. I hope the fines against Lindsay are minimal, but fines are one thing. She's not a bad girl and doesn't need to be in prison. She just needs to go back to school.
 
Back
Top