Originally posted by: sao123
Someone. CliffNotes. Please.
Originally posted by: spacelord
I love how the legal system always blames everyone up the chain.
If someone goes into McDonalds, buys a Salad which comes with a plastic fork.. and that fork is used to commit a homidicide, is McDonalds to blame?
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Difference is a bar took _reasonable_ measures to ensure it was following the law, so if you lie to it with a decent fake ID, it should not be held accountable. This person knew that she was breaking the law.Originally posted by: Anubis
bard cant be held responsibble if a patron gets wasted there and then goes off and kills someone in a car,
i see this as no different, the only thing she is guilty of is provideing the booze to a minor
Some say only penalize her with that, but I submit to you this: If you're caught driving drunk you get some fairly mild DUI, right? That's all you get. Now, what if you're driving drunk and kill somebody? It's no longer a simple DUI, but rather vehicular manslaughter (I think). In normal circumstances lindsay would be charged with sale to a minor, but in this one her action was a direct contributor in that minor killing somebody, so the law has to punish her harder.
This is legally speaking, mind you. I think the age of 21 is silly anyway and should be more in line with other laws like marriage/joining the military.
Originally posted by: jagec
Originally posted by: TechBoyJK
And now Megan hates Lindsay because "she" caused the accident and messed up her best friend.
women + driving = ??? :thumbsdown::thumbsdown:
:thumbsdown:
:thumbsdown:
:thumbsdown:
The person who caused the accident was the girl who drove drunk. End of story.
Skoorby is proud of you. I appreciated it when I was 17-18 and people were buying it for me, but I never bought it for others once I turned 19.[/quote]Originally posted by: Skoorb
Originally posted by: DainBramaged
Skoorby is proud of you. I appreciated it when I was 17-18 and people were buying it for me, but I never bought it for others once I turned 19.Originally posted by: Skoorb
Society does not allow her to drink because she is no likely to be mature to do it responsibly. When someone illegally bought her booze, they assumed much of the responsibility for this girls tragic actions.Originally posted by: jagec
The person who caused the accident was the girl who drove drunk. End of story.
Well the whole thing is a mess, but I KNOW I've read stories about people getting in BIG trouble for being the person who provided alcohol when something went wrong.Originally posted by: PingSpike
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Difference is a bar took _reasonable_ measures to ensure it was following the law, so if you lie to it with a decent fake ID, it should not be held accountable. This person knew that she was breaking the law.Originally posted by: Anubis
bard cant be held responsibble if a patron gets wasted there and then goes off and kills someone in a car,
i see this as no different, the only thing she is guilty of is provideing the booze to a minor
Some say only penalize her with that, but I submit to you this: If you're caught driving drunk you get some fairly mild DUI, right? That's all you get. Now, what if you're driving drunk and kill somebody? It's no longer a simple DUI, but rather vehicular manslaughter (I think). In normal circumstances lindsay would be charged with sale to a minor, but in this one her action was a direct contributor in that minor killing somebody, so the law has to punish her harder.
This is legally speaking, mind you. I think the age of 21 is silly anyway and should be more in line with other laws like marriage/joining the military.
Did the alcohol kill the old woman? Or was it the girl who drank the alcohol and then drove that killed her?
And as you point out "minor" just means "not 21 or older" here. And we hold murders accountable for their actions all the time that are technically minors.
I don't really like this law because it just seems full of holes. My theory is it came into being because the person who is responsible in drunk driving related deaths, the drunk driver, is usually dead. After they die, you have to find some one to blame. Kids are stupid, and they do stupid things when they get behind the wheel of a car....even when they aren't drunk they kill people.
Giving beer to a minor is giving beer to a minor. Make it illegal? Fine. Make its punishment insanely high? Fine. Make its punishment scale depending on the actions of another? Doesn't make much logical sense to me.
That is how I understand it will play out.Originally posted by: Vinney
I believe how it works is that currently your friend Lindsay can be held criminally liable for giving alcohol to someone underage - for which she could already receive jail time (depending on the state - but usually a couple of years) or just be hit with a fine. Lindsay the driver would be responsible for vehicular homicide. However, Lindsay your friend is open to civil liability by the family of the person who died, so she may have to pay a lot more money.
Originally posted by: sao123
so like are you still with megan?
Someone. CliffNotes. Please.
Originally posted by: Chaotic42
Originally posted by: jagec
The person who caused the accident was the girl who drove drunk. End of story.
Quoted for truth.
Originally posted by: JeffreyLebowski
Originally posted by: Chaotic42
Originally posted by: jagec
The person who caused the accident was the girl who drove drunk. End of story.
Quoted for truth.
Bullshit. She supplied alcohol to a minor, which is a criminal offense. If she hadn't done this it is possible that the accident wouldn't have a occured. She can and probably will be charged with manslaughter. Now if a jury convicts her is up in the air. But she will loose hands down in a civil case.
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: JeffreyLebowski
Originally posted by: Chaotic42
Originally posted by: jagec
The person who caused the accident was the girl who drove drunk. End of story.
Quoted for truth.
Bullshit. She supplied alcohol to a minor, which is a criminal offense. If she hadn't done this it is possible that the accident wouldn't have a occured. She can and probably will be charged with manslaughter. Now if a jury convicts her is up in the air. But she will loose hands down in a civil case.
Ahem - no offense, but I take it you're not an attorney. There is no basis for a manslaughter charge here, and even the most forward-leaning county attorney wouldn't pursue such a charge.
Originally posted by: FoBoT
OJ wasn't convicted, don't sweat it