Sniper rifles

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

PCboy

Senior member
Jul 9, 2001
847
0
0


<< I heard with the marine corp version of that .50 cal a skilled marksman could actually hit a target (jeep size or smaller) at a mile range with clear line of site and low wind. anyone know if that is true or not?

True. Most of the time. He might need a couple of shots.

By the way, check out this rifle AMP DSR-1
Under a meter long, under 7 kilos with scope. And check out the quoted groups - 5mm or less at 100 yards... Outrageous.
>>



Yup! That's my favorite sniper rifle. Too bad the German GSG-9s are the only ones that use it. If you play Ghost Recon check this out!
One
Two
 

AndrewR

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
11,157
0
0
I was told at the two-week Army Law of War Seminar (at their JAG School at UVA) that this is an old wive's tale, and even as a JAG with a significant amount of LOAC education and field experience I can't see any reason the use of a .50 cal with ball ammo would be illegal. See, for example, this Navy JAG page, which plainly states that "use of .50 caliber weapons against individual enemy combatants does not constitute a violation of [the] proscription against unnecessary suffering or superfluous injury."

Then someone needs to tell Intel officers that the Air Force JAG no longer considers .50 cal against personnel a LOAC violation because that's exactly how it is taught. :) In fact, Air Force Security Forces are also taught the very same thing as I happen to know a former one. Of course, as it's mentioned, no one ever really cares about that "law" anyway.

However, that Navy page does not appear to be the best work from what I read. Under lasers, it does not distinguish between lawful and unlawful uses of lasers. The use of blinding lasers is strictly prohibited by LOAC and that's not mentioned at all. It's definitely a broad overview of LOAC and an incomplete one at that.

Nevertheless, the primary use for a .50 cal sniper rifle is anti-material, not anti-personnel. There are few instances where the .50 cal rifle would be used against a person because the distances at which you use that gun as opposed to a 7.62mm or .30-06 require an exceptional amount of skill and perfect conditions to be accurate. It's also not the smallest gun to be toting around with a two person team trying to stay as invisible as possible!
 

Russ

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
21,093
3
0


<< I have fired many thousands of rounds through an M-16, and never had a jam. >>



Bigdude,

Brutuskend is right. When the M16 was first introduced, it was a major POS. I joined in late '74 and, in basic some of the DIs were so embarassed by the weapon's performance that they were fudging scores for 'cruits.

Russ, NCNE

 

Mookow

Lifer
Apr 24, 2001
10,162
0
0


<<

<< Technically, the military uses the .50cal rifles against equipment, not personnel (helicopters, light vehicles, radar, etc.). It is against the Law of Armed Conflict to deliberately use .50cal ammo against personnel. I'm certain that the U.S. military would never do that... ;) >>



That being said, go read about how Carlos Norman Hatchcock used a Browning M2HB with a scope to do some amazing snipes against the VC in Viet Nam.
>>



Yup. He scored some hits at 2,500+ yards.