Smartwatch, what problem are they trying to solve?

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Red Storm

Lifer
Oct 2, 2005
14,233
234
106
I must be the only one who thinks that in 5 years you'll be able to "slap bracelet" your phone onto your wrist. Just need a little more advancements to make everything smaller, lighter, and most of the components flexible, but we are getting there.


The clasp (preferably ceramic, and would house all non-flexible elements) would be easy to do magnetically, wireless charging is already in devices, and flexible displays (OLED) are doable right now, it's the SoC and battery that would be hard. Maybe something like SMA shielded by flexible insulation would give the phone rigidity in "phone mode" when current is applied.

While that may doable in 5 years, I sure as heck wouldn't want one. I do not want a phone on my wrist. It appears a few people in this thread do want just that, and I hope they get the option for it. But for me, I want a smartwatch that doesn't require lots of fiddling, gets me my notifications, does fitness related things, has Google Now, looks nice and lasts more than a day. I think the next gen Moto 360 will be exactly that.

That fenix 2 seems like something that solves a problem and works well. More smart watch than the smart watch apple etc.. Are trying to push.

It's ugly though.

If all you want is a fitness watch, then sure it works, but for me the primary use of a smartwatch is instant access to notifications and Google Now, so these fitness watches are useless to me, especially for a device I will be wearing all day, every day.
 
Last edited:

rudeguy

Lifer
Dec 27, 2001
47,351
14
61
A smartwatch that has to be charged daily...nope.
It has to be a week at least before I would consider it. Looking forward to "charged the smartwatch but forgot to charge the smartphone" threads.

That's like saying you won't use a cell phone because you have to charge it daily. Plug it in when you go to bed. What's so hard about that?
 

Red Storm

Lifer
Oct 2, 2005
14,233
234
106
That's like saying you won't use a cell phone because you have to charge it daily. Plug it in when you go to bed. What's so hard about that?

You don't even plug it in, they all (or most of them anyway) come with cradles you just drop the watch onto. Pretty sure the Moto 360 works on most QI wireless chargers.
 

Fire&Blood

Platinum Member
Jan 13, 2009
2,333
18
81
That's like saying you won't use a cell phone because you have to charge it daily. Plug it in when you go to bed. What's so hard about that?

Nothing really, charging daily is not that inconvenient. I guess the hate comes from my unreasonable expectation for the smartwatches to functions as carefree as traditional watches. Probably just too old school for it and since phones killed the need for me to have a watch already, I expect too much from it to justify the purchase. It's neat to have the smartwatch functionality, especially since we are no longer allowed to phones at work.

There is something about these smartwatch and NFC presentations that turns me off. A lifetime of being used to pulling the phones and wallets out of my pockets and swiping my CC's makes it hard to justify a $200-300 smartwatch purchase.
 

Phoenix86

Lifer
May 21, 2003
14,644
10
81
I must be the only one who thinks that in 5 years you'll be able to "slap bracelet" your phone onto your wrist. Just need a little more advancements to make everything smaller, lighter, and most of the components flexible, but we are getting there.


The clasp (preferably ceramic, and would house all non-flexible elements) would be easy to do magnetically, wireless charging is already in devices, and flexible displays (OLED) are doable right now, it's the SoC and battery that would be hard. Maybe something like SMA shielded by flexible insulation would give the phone rigidity in "phone mode" when current is applied.
fashion1.jpg