- Apr 12, 2012
- 514
- 0
- 0
I have a Xbox 360 with 4gb of memory and no hard drive and have NO troubles with the load times on any of my games but yet I hear people complain. The load times can't be all that bad.....
if Xbox allowed SSDs it would be awesome.
It depends on the game.
Try playing Skyrim and see if you don't start bashing your controller around during the loading screens.
The PS3 does, but I don't know if you could justify it. Only a few games really load much faster; Gran Turismo 5 is one. Need SATA 6.
Try playing Skyrim and see if you don't start bashing your controller around during the loading screens.
Way back in the dark ages of computing we used to wait about 30 minutes for a game to load....from tape. Nowadays many console games take a minute or two to load up to get to the playable part.
A decent spec PC on the other hand that isn't constrained by stupid title screens that can't be skipped can get there in 10 seconds or so. Even HDD installed xbox/ps3 games can't come close to performing the same as a machine with 5x as much HDD and CPU performance.
This, I can barely tell if its loading from DVD or HD.I notice very little difference whenever I install a game to the HDD on my 360. :|
The load times aren't as annoying as much as the disc swapping is for some games. Install Mass Effect 3 on your PC and you only ever need to keep disc 1 in the drive to access all the games content. Save both DVD's to the 360's hard drive however and tough luck. You'll be swapping discs back and forth every 20 minutes or so if you do side quest missions as soon as they appear. (Which you pretty much have to do, as they vanish with negative consequences if put on the back burner) I'm pretty sure when both discs are installed on the systems hdd that keeping disc 1 in the 360 should be quite sufficient to not be pestered on a regular basis.
I notice very little difference whenever I install a game to the HDD on my 360. :|
