Originally posted by: Denithor
I would say, try it with the Q6600. If it just doesn't satisfy, sell the Q6600 to your friend and bump up to a Q9450 and OC to ~4GHz.
Originally posted by: aigomorla
Originally posted by: Denithor
I would say, try it with the Q6600. If it just doesn't satisfy, sell the Q6600 to your friend and bump up to a Q9450 and OC to ~4GHz.
*sigh*
if it was only that simple.
If it was mark would have more hair right now. 😛
Originally posted by: Markfw900
You need an unlocked multi to get 4 ghz IMO.
Originally posted by: JAG87
And by the way, add GRID to the list of games that utilize quads. I have seen my cpu peak to 65% usage during game play. And still, with 2 cores disabled I get exactly the same fps.
Hmm.. maybe I would see the difference if I turn down the resolution and lower my settings to medium. Wouldn't that be humorous after you spend 1500 dollars in graphics.
Originally posted by: JAG87
I am sure it does make a difference so if he plays supreme commander, dual core should not be on his shopping list. Quads also make a big difference in UT3 at any given resolution.
I would recommend an E8400, and an easy overclock of 450x9. Should play well with his 780i and DDR2-1000.
Should new games come out, like Crysis Warhead or Mirror's Edge (hey thats UT3 engine from what I heard, wink wink), he can always sell the E8400 (like hes going to have trouble doing that..), and buy a Q9650 (which will be out by the time these games come), and then he can have the best of both worlds (400x10 = 4 ghz quad core).
As of right now though, he is better off saving money. That's my view of it.