Bluga,
He's not saying that the SQ. WAVE has slew rate, he's saying the opamp has slew rate.... which means if you put a square wave in... you won't get an infinitesimally small rise-time square wave on the output.... you'll get a sloping rise and fall time of 0.5V/usec. So, you're answer to the question is:
When the input goes from 0.0V to 0.1V, the output of the amp has to swing from 0.0V to -0.5 Volt (due to the gain). Therefore, it will take the amp 1usec to reach -0.5V. Therefore, on the output you have to draw asloping line for 1usec from 0.0V to -0.5V. Then, it is flat at -0.5 Volt until the next input transistion, where it will go from 0.1 to -0.5. Therefore the output will swing from -0.5V to +2.5V --> 3V swing.
A 3V swing will take 3/0.5 usec... = 6usec. Therefore, at the 6usec mark, the output will have only slewed for 3usec... or half the time it needed to. Therefore, only have the swing (1.5V) would have been accomplished. Therefore, the answer to the second part is -0.5 + 1.5 = 1.0V.
The one thing I didn't take into account here is the UNITY-GAIN bandwidth deal at 5*10e6 rad/sec. That is actually 796.2kHz. The square wave is 166.7kHz. However... depending on how the Gain-bandwidth curve of the op-amp is, you could actually run out of gas trying to get a gain of 5 out of the thing at 166.7. We don't know the slope of the GBW curve though... but if I got with what "normally" is... I'm thinking that you'd need a unity GBW product of 5*166.7kHz to support a gain of 5 @ 166kHz. However, since this is "not" sinusoidal, I think slew rate is all you need to worry about --> and which is somehow (that I don't remember) related to the GBW product. I believe the answers above are right. Let me know what the solutions are... it has been 2 years since i've even touched an op-amp equation.