• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Skins down 10 4th quarter

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: BlancoNino
Originally posted by: Hacp
alexander is overrated. His offensive line is the only thing keeping him from gettign - yardage every play
How can you argue with 28 Touchdowns and the rushing record?
seattle only played 5 games this season against teams with a .500 or better record. he rushed for 100+ yards against the giants, falcons and indy. so 6 of those 28 touchdowns occured against teams with a .500 or better record. and 3 of those were against a indy team that had their usual starters riding the bench to rest.

im not stating whether he's a great back or not, just simply stating the facts.
 
Originally posted by: anxi80
Originally posted by: BlancoNino
Originally posted by: Hacp
alexander is overrated. His offensive line is the only thing keeping him from gettign - yardage every play
How can you argue with 28 Touchdowns and the rushing record?
seattle only played 5 games this season against teams with a .500 or better record. he rushed for 100+ yards against the giants, falcons and indy. so 6 of those 28 touchdowns occured against teams with a .500 or better record. and 3 of those were against a indy team that had their usual starters riding the bench to rest.

im not stating whether he's a great back or not, just simply stating the facts.

When you play against teams that bad, the starters don't usually play the whole game either, as was the case for Alexander in several games this year.

 
Originally posted by: Proletariat
Completely disappointing. looks like the Skins have given up

The Skins suck compared to the other playoff teams. You've probably seen them when they were actually good so why the surprise? Huge difference between the team this year and the ones from '91 or '87 etc...
 
Originally posted by: Zap Brannigan
Originally posted by: PaulNEPats
The skins are an average team playing in a horrible conference.

horrible conference? NFC east was one of the better conferences this year... I mean, look at seatle. Arizona, SF and St. Louis? Yeah, thats really tough... :roll:

 
Back
Top