Originally posted by: Slickone
Is x16 a lower density than x8 (since x4 is high)?
		
		
	 
Depends on your definition of density.  Its the same density if you define it as capacity (Mbit) per chip, lower if you define it as data bus pins per chip, lower if you are counting chips required to equal one 64-bit DIMM rank, different still if you define it relative to the memory controller's maximum supported address lines.
I don't like to use terms like high or low density for this reason but I do because resellers use it in their marketing.
	
	
		
		
			Intel's 
page for the 845GV says 266DDR.  So why does everything else point to higher...
		
 
Intel's product specs state support for DDR 333/266/200/PC133, as do Intel's own 845GV based motherboards, but DDR333 is supported only when the processor bus is 533MHz.  PC3200 is backwards compatible to DDR333 ~ DDR200.
	
	
		
		
			Another thing I noticed is Kingston says 128 or 256 std, Crucial says 512 (guessing Crucial is wrong).
		
		
	 
What the chipset is capable of and what the BIOS has adequate support for aren't the same things.
The chipset supports 1024MB per DIMM for 2GB max installed RAM using modules built with 512Mbit chips.  The BIOS, however, likely was never validated with many 1024MB modules (if any at all), given the age of this board and the latest eMachine's BIOS.
That's why I recommend sticking to a max of 512MB per module.