Single core OR Dual core Opteron?

chadder

Junior Member
Feb 13, 2006
4
0
0
Hey guys, as you can tell, I'm brand-spanking new on this forum. I asked this over at tomshardware forums, but only one guy really helped me out.

Ok, I'm on a relatively tight budget right now, but my old motherboard, memory, and cpu has gone kaput on me and I am in need of new suff. Here is what I am thinkin on getting:

ASRock 939Dual (for my x800xt AIW i just bought a month ago)
2gigs G.SKill DDR500 or 1gig OCZ Platinum PC4800
Opteron 146 or 165

Now here's the catch. If i get the 165, I wont be able to afford the 2 gigs of memory (which I want). So I can get either the 165 with 1gig, or the 146 and 2 gigs...IM SO TORN!!! (I am fully aware of the overclocking possibilities of both)

Please give me a reason to your suggestions.

Thanks!
 

dguy6789

Diamond Member
Dec 9, 2002
8,558
3
76
I would get the 165 and 1Gb of ram because you can always upgrade later. With a 146 and 2GB of ram, if you ever wanted to get a 165, you would have to worry about what to do with your old 146.
 

JonnyBlaze

Diamond Member
May 24, 2001
3,114
1
0
Welcome to the forums.


I would also go with the 165. Chances are dual core will offer more benifit to you over 2 gigs of ram anyways.



 

vanvock

Senior member
Jan 1, 2005
959
0
0
Hello & Welcome, It really depends on what you are going to do with the system. I got the 146 because I don't do much multi-tasking, if you get 1 stick ram you won't have dual channel. If it's a gaming rig I would probably go for the 146 & 2gigs because it may be a while before the dual core helps out there but the ram will be good now, again depending on what games you play.
 

chadder

Junior Member
Feb 13, 2006
4
0
0
I use it for a little bit of DVD encoding, but mostly gaming.

Probably 98% game machine.

I'm leaning towards the 146 and 2 gigs, I'll see what i can do with budget memory and the 165. I hear the 165's as of late have had some problems from the toms' forums. Will having budget memory affect an overclock on the 165? I was looking at that memory 'cause it is only about $40-50 more expensive than budget stuff. I also was taking into consideration overclocking with memory at 1:1 with the processor. I've been using my XP too long; I dont know much about overclocking a64's.

(possibility)
With socket AM2 comming out, I was looking at using the 146 for a while, then upgrading to a dual core AM2 chip once prices settle down a little bit (and clock speeds increase)
 

vanvock

Senior member
Jan 1, 2005
959
0
0
I think the 939's will be kickin' for a while yet so I'm not worried about the AM2, I'll wait for the F when they do a real upgrade. There is a lot of good info here on OC'ing AMD's & using value RAM. You can use a memory divider to help get a good OC.

 

t3h l337 n3wb

Platinum Member
Apr 22, 2005
2,698
0
76
Originally posted by: MegaRoll
Originally posted by: joedrake
Originally posted by: Sqube
Originally posted by: Bobthelost
165 and 2gb of BUDGET RAM.

Cosine
Tangent.
Sine

Fixed. Oh, and
Cotangent
Cosine
Cosecant.

There.

To the OP: Athlon 64s/Opterons aren't very bandwidth hungry, so there's not going to be much of a performance difference between super-expensive premium RAM and value RAM. You can run a memory divider when overclocking, and all will be well. 2x1GB of value RAM should only cost about $140.
 

ShadowBlade

Diamond Member
Feb 11, 2005
4,263
0
0
Why does everyone insist on buying the fastest RAM they can find? Unless you plan on overclocking to the point where a quality phase change cooler would be needed, DDR500 is about as high as most AMD users would need.

Just get DDR400 Value RAM and an Opteron 165
 

dguy6789

Diamond Member
Dec 9, 2002
8,558
3
76
There is no performance difference between a 1GB stick of pc3200 that costs $70 and another that costs $250+. All the expensive ram is for, is for suckers and uninformed buyers. Buying super expensive "low latency high performance ram" is like buying a geforce fx5200 with 256 or 512MB of memory and thinking it will be faster than a 128MB one.