• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Simple Post

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Ron Paul.. I tend to agree with almost everything he has to say - most of which the other candidates do not even have the guts to talk about. Also, he is THE ONLY candidate that has even mentioned my generation in a positive light.

Oh ya.. and he comes from 'The Greatest' generation. I'm sick of the baby-boomers spending my generation's money.

 
Guiliani - he'll be worse than Bush and perhaps after his and Bush's presidencies Americans may come a bit more to their senses.
 
Originally posted by: Martin
Guiliani - he'll be worse than Bush and perhaps after his and Bush's presidencies Americans may come a bit more to their senses.

That's the worst justification for a vote I have ever seen. Vote for the worst?

Goddamn.. at least use a write-in vote to vote for the guy you want..
 
Dr. Paul all the way. His economic ideology interests me and I'd love to see what portion of it would make it to reality when put in check by someone with more economic education than Dr. Paul. The one thing I'm relatively certain of with Ron Paul is that cabinet positions will likely be filled with qualified individuals rather than the corporate lackeys he owes favors to for getting elected. I don't agree with everything that Dr. Paul says and anyone who's voting for someone who agrees with them completely is damn sure voting for someone who's pandering to them. We're all individuals and are never going to agree on everything unless we're telling each other what we want to hear. Ron Paul is spot on in his foreign policy ideology and I could only dream that he'd be able to accomplish 25% of what he'd like to as president. We are long over due to end our role as world police. The sooner we can end our endless entanglements across the globe, the sooner we can focus energy and resources on strengthening our country at home. The number one issue I'd like to see Dr. Paul elected on however is ending the growing executive and the return of our personal freedoms. It's time to quit giving up our freedoms to asinine policies like The Patriot Act, The John W. Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2006, and NSPD51/HSPD20 because we're all afraid the boogeyman is coming to get us.
 
Ralph Nader 😛

Frankly, the only one I'd be inclined to vote for at this point would be Obama, and I'm not sure about him.



 
I will vote for Obama.Just because to see the end of discrimination of black on the basis of racism.I think the black should have the equal rights in every part of life.
 
Originally posted by: KingTech
I will vote for Obama.Just because to see the end of discrimination of black on the basis of racism.I think the black should have the equal rights in every part of life.

So you are voting for someone just because of their race? That makes you a racist.
 
Paul. I agree with a lot of his positions and he is the only candidate that I feel is honest. I get the distinct feeling that the rest of them are liars, every word out of their mouths carefully planned and tested with focus groups. They all conveniently change their positions depending on who they are currently pandering to, while Pauls been saying the same things for decades.
 
Obama... he's the only one left with any sanity, integrity, or soul.

Besides, I've already printed 1000 Obama vs. Osama t-shirts... 😉
 
Originally posted by: hscorpio
Paul. I agree with a lot of his positions and he is the only candidate that I feel is honest. I get the distinct feeling that the rest of them are liars, every word out of their mouths carefully planned and tested with focus groups. They all conveniently change their positions depending on who they are currently pandering to, while Pauls been saying the same things for decades.

What makes you think Kucinich has lied about anything?
 
Originally posted by: Martin
Guiliani - he'll be worse than Bush and perhaps after his and Bush's presidencies Americans may come a bit more to their senses.

We already did that by Bush going back in 2004.

And we did it before that with twelve disastrous years of Reagan/Bush 41, from debt to a redistribution of wealth to the wealthy to the US sponsoring death squads, terrorts etc.
 
Hillary Clinton. She shares my ideas, and she has the toughness to get them done.
I also thought the Clinton years were good for this country.
 
Back
Top