Simple lesson...free knowledge.

[DesignDawg]

Hey all,

Just thought I would break down a couple of simple rules of human dynamics and communication for those who care to read it. It's really just an observation that seems obvious to me. It may very well be obvious to everyone else also, but I thought I'd share anyway.

When there is an issue being discussed, and there are two sides of the issue, and I repeat, the ISSUE is the topic of discussion, the way you go about it is you post your views on the ISSUE. If you do that and there are people who disagree with you, they will simply respond with a rebuttal from the other side of the issue. If, on the other hand, you respond with your views about the issue AND why you think everyone who disagrees with you is a bad person/asshole/moron/etc., then YOU ARE ATTACKING PERSONALLY EVERYONE ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THAT ISSUE. Is this a hard concept to grasp? I know, it's obvious. But some people will come into a thread and lambast people on the other side of the issue and then get angry when those people flame them.
What's with that?
Just remember: If you JUDGE PEOPLE based on their views, without knowing that person's heart, that makes you an asshole. A person's views may not make him a bad person. But a person's view of himself as a superior person because of his views DOES.

Ricky
DesignDawg

 

[jhu]

you're wrong

 

[UG]

And worthless.

 

[DesignDawg]

I see. And I disagree. And I'll have you know that anyone who disagrees with me is a racist child molester.

Ricky
DesignDawg

 

[tvman28]

Mmmmnnn.

 

[thebestMAX]

I agree.

 

[The Wildcard]

Bravo...

 

[Howard]

Stupid people should never stick their head here. Starting a thread to complain about others like yourself???

 

[jhu]

When there is an issue being discussed, and there are two sides of the issue, and I repeat, the ISSUE is the topic of discussion, the way you go about it is you post your views on the ISSUE.

i want ice cream

If you do that and there are people who disagree with you, they will simply respond with a rebuttal from the other side of the issue.

you can't have my ice cream...

If, on the other hand, you respond with your views about the issue AND why you think everyone who disagrees with you is a bad person/asshole/moron/etc., then YOU ARE ATTACKING PERSONALLY EVERYONE ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THAT ISSUE. Is this a hard concept to grasp?

...because you're a bad person.

But some people will come into a thread and lambast people on the other side of the issue and then get angry when those people flame them.

stay away from my ice cream you bad person.

 

[cxim]

DD,

I am glad you finally admitted to being a racially motivated child molester, of intemperate thought & speech. Your selfserving superior attitude remains inflammatory & counterproductive.

It is quite obvious that your views do make you a bad person. There is no issue so important that an unjustified personal attack is out of place. It is a waste of time to formulate a logical response when your dubious parentage & private deviant sexual practices can be exposed to the world.

You thought it would never be revealed how your nazi cannibal adopted parents made millions selling the shruken heads of Jesuit missionaries in the jungles of Pnuogang to ignorant natives.

How about the Watermelon Of Jeebus that filed sexual harassment charges aginst you. We know the charges were dismissed on a technical point of order, just because the watermelon was unable to prove its identity.

I want you to know that it is personal, because I do know what is in your heart.. That deep, dark cesspool that bumps & slithers along, inside the smooth glitzy exterior facade you so smugly present to the outside world.

Just because you changed your name from Wayne Newton to DesignDog, had plastic surgery & hid out in a cornfield, your past is not lost. It will haunt you forever.

I had thought to flame you, but decided to debate your post on its merits instead.