- Jun 30, 2004
- 16,420
- 1,925
- 126
At 77, still dealing with loss of two family members, with lower energy, I think that the technology and volume of information to absorb is leaving me with a feeling of "not keeping up." But I AM keeping up. I just don't have time to go out and re-verify things. Here's what I THINK I know.
From activist involvement going back to 2004, I was keen on the idea of "blue business" versus "red business". You can boycott with your feet, so to speak, and patronize business supporting one or the other side of the political struggle. I had been reliably informed that COSTCO is a decidedly "blue" business. Owners or major stockholders donate to the Democratic Party. At least I had that as comfort for so many years. Obviously, a Democrat might avoid shopping at Walmart as much as possible, because we know where the Walton family money goes in political donations.
Another recent development in aftermath of the election: While other labor unions and labor leaders opposed the Trump candidacy, Teamsters Union voiced support for Trump. You can correct me if I'm wrong.
So here's a recent Inauguration Day news item about a pending strike at COSTCO:
COSTCO Union Authorizes Nationwide Strike
I'm not sure that rank-and-file employees of an outfit like COSTCO keep up with all the facts in our ongoing political struggle. There is a chance that COSTCO will negotiate terms with the union, but one must wonder just what the demands of the union might be, and how well COSTCO employees are treated in terms of wages and many other issues. I shop at COSTCO frequently and I've come to know several employees there over the past two decades.
But the question remains: Is the threat of a strike being created by the union on behalf of other Trump-aligned interests? Is the political Trump coalition trying to sow discord in "blue business" by promoting a strike?
I spoke to some COSTCO employees yesterday during my shopping trip. They don't seem to be aware of COSTCO's political orientation as opposed to that of an outfit like WalMart. But -- sure -- they can strike, and I hope their demands are at least partially met.
From activist involvement going back to 2004, I was keen on the idea of "blue business" versus "red business". You can boycott with your feet, so to speak, and patronize business supporting one or the other side of the political struggle. I had been reliably informed that COSTCO is a decidedly "blue" business. Owners or major stockholders donate to the Democratic Party. At least I had that as comfort for so many years. Obviously, a Democrat might avoid shopping at Walmart as much as possible, because we know where the Walton family money goes in political donations.
Another recent development in aftermath of the election: While other labor unions and labor leaders opposed the Trump candidacy, Teamsters Union voiced support for Trump. You can correct me if I'm wrong.
So here's a recent Inauguration Day news item about a pending strike at COSTCO:
COSTCO Union Authorizes Nationwide Strike
I'm not sure that rank-and-file employees of an outfit like COSTCO keep up with all the facts in our ongoing political struggle. There is a chance that COSTCO will negotiate terms with the union, but one must wonder just what the demands of the union might be, and how well COSTCO employees are treated in terms of wages and many other issues. I shop at COSTCO frequently and I've come to know several employees there over the past two decades.
But the question remains: Is the threat of a strike being created by the union on behalf of other Trump-aligned interests? Is the political Trump coalition trying to sow discord in "blue business" by promoting a strike?
I spoke to some COSTCO employees yesterday during my shopping trip. They don't seem to be aware of COSTCO's political orientation as opposed to that of an outfit like WalMart. But -- sure -- they can strike, and I hope their demands are at least partially met.