• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

Should we establish a prize?

Lonyo

Lifer
Aug 10, 2002
21,938
6
81
Hopefully there will be more than 24 hours of gameplay. You never know. (*hopes*)
 

RealityTime

Senior member
Oct 18, 2004
665
0
0
Originally posted by: Lonyo
Hopefully there will be more than 24 hours of gameplay. You never know. (*hopes*)


the review in pcgamer said he beat the game in 17 hours.
 

slag

Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
10,473
81
101
Why would you want to beat it so fast? I think thats pretty dumb. Take the time to explore the levels, check out all the graphics, play around a bit, etc.

Hell, for $60.00 or so, whatever it costs after tax, I'd be spending 24 hours on each single level getting my money's worth.

 

Drizzy

Golden Member
Dec 12, 2003
1,229
0
0
I think Doom3 made me bitter about paying full price on a game that I havent heard from real players about. I'm going to wait a few weeks on this one. :( Doom3 sucked and I paid nearly $60 for it. If I do get HL2 I'm gonna take my time as well. It seems like it would be a game at times you'll want to sit back and enjoy.
 

jiffylube1024

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2002
7,430
0
71
There should be a prize for the person who beats it last - it shows who's got the most discipline ;) .
 

Slogun

Platinum Member
Jul 4, 2001
2,587
0
0
Originally posted by: slag
Why would you want to beat it so fast? I think thats pretty dumb. Take the time to explore the levels, check out all the graphics, play around a bit, etc.

Hell, for $60.00 or so, whatever it costs after tax, I'd be spending 24 hours on each single level getting my money's worth.
Ditto that.

 

Yossarian

Lifer
Dec 26, 2000
18,010
1
81
Originally posted by: slag
Why would you want to beat it so fast? I think thats pretty dumb. Take the time to explore the levels, check out all the graphics, play around a bit, etc.

Hell, for $60.00 or so, whatever it costs after tax, I'd be spending 24 hours on each single level getting my money's worth.

no kidding. I'm not gonna rush through it after waiting 4+ years for it to come out.
 

gUEv

Senior member
Oct 11, 2000
882
0
0
Why would we reward someone being a loser?

edit: sorta like the day that san andreas came out and people were bragging about reaching Las Venturas. Maybe I am alone in this opinion, but it doesnt make you look cool or impressive, it just shows you have too much free time
 

Anubis

No Lifer
Aug 31, 2001
78,712
427
126
tbqhwy.com
Originally posted by: slag
Why would you want to beat it so fast? I think thats pretty dumb. Take the time to explore the levels, check out all the graphics, play around a bit, etc.

Hell, for $60.00 or so, whatever it costs after tax, I'd be spending 24 hours on each single level getting my money's worth.

i beat halo teusday afternoon, got home and started playing at 2am finished at 4pm

24 hours of gameplay? this ia a FPS not a RPG
 

LordNoob

Senior member
Nov 16, 2003
998
8
81
Originally posted by: Drizzy
I think Doom3 made me bitter about paying full price on a game that I havent heard from real players about. I'm going to wait a few weeks on this one. :( Doom3 sucked and I paid nearly $60 for it. If I do get HL2 I'm gonna take my time as well. It seems like it would be a game at times you'll want to sit back and enjoy.

Doom 3 did not suck- it was great. It did however return to another era of gameplay, which you may or may not like.
 

KillyKillall

Diamond Member
Jul 1, 2004
4,415
0
0
Originally posted by: Anubis
Originally posted by: slag
Why would you want to beat it so fast? I think thats pretty dumb. Take the time to explore the levels, check out all the graphics, play around a bit, etc.

Hell, for $60.00 or so, whatever it costs after tax, I'd be spending 24 hours on each single level getting my money's worth.

i beat halo teusday afternoon, got home and started playing at 2am finished at 4pm

24 hours of gameplay? this ia a FPS not a RPG

Half-Life 2, not Halo 2.
 

NYHoustonman

Platinum Member
Dec 8, 2002
2,642
0
0
OP

No, because if you try and run through the game as fast as possible I think you're missing the point here. You're supposed to enjoy it.
 

t3hmuffinman

Senior member
Sep 10, 2004
536
0
0
agreed. later after we've all played it through, it would be interesting to see how fast people can go through the levels (there was some site dedicated to this... had individual runs through each loading section/level from quake, quake 2, half life, and some other stuff). but now is the time to enjoy a game 6 years in the making to the fullest.