Originally posted by: waggy
hahah trade him?
that would be a dumb idea. he was the team in the Chi game. Chi could NOT stop him at all. he was getting 1st down after 1st down.
Originally posted by: waggy
hahah trade him?
that would be a dumb idea. he was the team in the Chi game. Chi could NOT stop him at all. he was getting 1st down after 1st down.
Originally posted by: Garet Jax
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
They should let him go. Put the money elsewhere. I am of the opinion that offensive lines and offensive schemes make the running back anyway. You take any running back and give him those wide open lanes that Alexander was running through and, guess what, he'll run through them too.
With a few exceptions (Sanders, Payton, etc...) I agree.
Originally posted by: rbV5
Funny, I didn't see many wide open lanes for Alexander to run through...looked more like typical Alexander finding the seam and making the defense miss. He remains a top back, and "great" backs are hard to come by.
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
Originally posted by: rbV5
Funny, I didn't see many wide open lanes for Alexander to run through...looked more like typical Alexander finding the seam and making the defense miss. He remains a top back, and "great" backs are hard to come by.
They showed the lanes several times from behind the line during replays. kinda hard to miss them unless you were up refilling the potato chip bowl.
Originally posted by: chrisms
Even in his best season I had no faith in him during the playoffs. He is inconsistent and gets most of his stats from the fact that he is always given the ball at the 2 yard line and the occasional big game he has. This year he was basically worthless both because of injuries and performance.
I'm not complaining about how he did against Chicago, but is he really worth keeping? Who are the free agent backs the Seahawks may have a chance at this offseason? I see no reason to keep Alexander unless he takes a huge pay cut to allow the team to fill some other holes.