Should Intel Have Killed OCing With Sandy?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

superstition

Platinum Member
Feb 2, 2008
2,219
221
101
Intel sells a million CPU's a day. Do you think they give two farts about the 10 people that delid?
Yes, just as, contrary to the claim that Intel doesn't care about the enthusiast overclocking community, it released Devil's Canyon — with the promise of improved TIM.

McDonalds sells a lot of hamburgers every day but manages to make money by selling a lot of other things, too.
 

BonzaiDuck

Lifer
Jun 30, 2004
16,333
1,888
126
Shhh...Stop making sense with sound logic.

And frankly I could care less about OCing when the top-end i7-Ks are already 4+GHz out of the box, and the landscape now is completely different from the times when the bargain basement and the uber expensive CPUs are different only by clocks and cache capacity.

It makes one wonder about plans for a new system. I'd said before I was going to do it this year out of curiosity and for the addictive fun of it.

I won't be able to help myself: I'll overclock that sucker.
 

Sheep221

Golden Member
Oct 28, 2012
1,843
27
81
Shhh...Stop making sense with sound logic.

And frankly I could care less about OCing when the top-end i7-Ks are already 4+GHz out of the box, and the landscape now is completely different from the times when the bargain basement and the uber expensive CPUs are different only by clocks and cache capacity.
Where I don't make sense? Maybe you referring to some other post tho.
 

Phynaz

Lifer
Mar 13, 2006
10,140
819
126
Yes, just as, contrary to the claim that Intel doesn't care about the enthusiast overclocking community, it released Devil's Canyon — with the promise of improved TIM.

McDonalds sells a lot of hamburgers every day but manages to make money by selling a lot of other things, too.

Horrible analogy.

Does McDonalds care about making a specialty product that that .001% of their customers will buy? No, they don't.
 

Nhirlathothep

Senior member
Aug 23, 2014
478
2
46
www.youtube.com
it s a lot years oc is a commercial trap on Intel.


when i see a ivy-haswell-skylake 4core overclocked config i smell a gamer.
in the last 10y they re more than hw-enthusiast sadly
 

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
25,661
15,161
136
Sigh. oc-ability is free publicity.
When your friends and familiy have computer issues, who are they gonna call?
Right.
You.
Case closed.
 

superstition

Platinum Member
Feb 2, 2008
2,219
221
101
Does McDonalds care about making a specialty product that that .001% of their customers will buy? No, they don't.
Like Devil's Canyon?

Or, Broadwell C?


McDonald's, by the way, even sells temporary products — products that are only available for a limited time, periodically — like McRib. McRib, in most locales, has been in and out of the menu quite a few times since 1981.

The logic I responded to that you posted strongly implies that McDonalds should just focus on selling hamburgers and other core products. The fact is that the company makes money by selling a lot of peripheral products, even products like McRib that are not often even available to buy.

Companies don't voluntarily choose to throw away profit. The real question isn't how many will be sold, your .001%. The real question is: Is the cost/benefit ratio good enough for Intel to offer the product. Plenty of products are sold that target small sales numbers, including by huge corporations that do high volume sales. High-end halo products are a good example of that.
 
Last edited:

monkeydelmagico

Diamond Member
Nov 16, 2011
3,961
145
106
Yes, just as, contrary to the claim that Intel doesn't care about the enthusiast overclocking community, it released Devil's Canyon — with the promise of improved TIM.

McDonalds sells a lot of hamburgers every day but manages to make money by selling a lot of other things, too.

Wait what? McDonalds is going to sell a devils canyon big mac? I'm gonna overclock that special sauce so hard it will need a HUGE custom water loop to fit in my mouth.
 

poofyhairguy

Lifer
Nov 20, 2005
14,612
318
126
I'm not so sure that a 4GHz Skylake doesn't already perform as well or better than a 5GHz Sandy Bridge. What you're asking for is likely already here.

I meant to say I expected six cores by now too (actually I was more expected 8 by now seeing how fast we went from 2 to 4).
 

Headfoot

Diamond Member
Feb 28, 2008
4,444
641
126
I'm in for a 8c/16t overclocked McRib. Latest model has integrated barbeque sauce too
 

Dave3000

Golden Member
Jan 10, 2011
1,495
108
106
I think they should have disabled overclocking, and sold these processors locked. Maybe then Intel would be selling higher clocked chips and each generation. Most people that are running their 2600k's at 4.4GHz or higher have no incentives of upgrading to a 6700k 4GHz that might not overclock well but someone running his 2600k at stock settings who does not overclock because he wants a stable system would more likely have an incentive to upgrade to a 6700k than someone with a highly overclocked 2600k.
 

StinkyPinky

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2002
6,956
1,268
126
The only overclock I did on my 4790k was to make all four cores run at 4.4 when they turbo. Apart from that I couldn't be bothered, it's fast enough already. The 4790k turbos all four cores to 4.2 by default already, so it's effectively 4.2 out of the box. That's pretty impressive for stock.
 

moonbogg

Lifer
Jan 8, 2011
10,731
3,440
136
No way man. I love my OC'd Sandy. Sexy ass loyal beast of a chip she is. She loves me long time. LONG ASS TIME.
 

superstition

Platinum Member
Feb 2, 2008
2,219
221
101
Wait what? McDonalds is going to sell a devils canyon big mac? I'm gonna overclock that special sauce so hard it will need a HUGE custom water loop to fit in my mouth.
I guess that's when you discover that the new and improved special sauce tastes suspiciously like the old one — and come to the conclusion that overclocking isn't really needed after all.
 
Last edited:

CakeMonster

Golden Member
Nov 22, 2012
1,621
798
136
Sandy has had a very good run, and requirements have not risen greatly overall, but I find that a lot of people are exaggerating its IPC and absolute performance in new games and apps.
 

monkeydelmagico

Diamond Member
Nov 16, 2011
3,961
145
106
I guess that's when you discover that the new and improved special sauce tastes suspiciously like the old one — and come to the conclusion that overclocking isn't really needed after all.

I don't think you understand how this world works. Your own conclusion is not really relevant. Whether it be CPUs or burgers you will accept what either Intel or Ronald tell you.

mcdonalds.jpg
 

moonbogg

Lifer
Jan 8, 2011
10,731
3,440
136
Sandy has had a very good run, and requirements have not risen greatly overall, but I find that a lot of people are exaggerating its IPC and absolute performance in new games and apps.

Be careful talking about SB like that. You may get struck by lightning. Anything less than absolute praise may be considered blasphemous. Sandy IS the best damn CPU, always and forever.
When I replace mine with something else, only then will that new one become the best CPU ever. That's how this works.
 

BonzaiDuck

Lifer
Jun 30, 2004
16,333
1,888
126
Be careful talking about SB like that. You may get struck by lightning. Anything less than absolute praise may be considered blasphemous. Sandy IS the best damn CPU, always and forever.
When I replace mine with something else, only then will that new one become the best CPU ever. That's how this works.

Oh! An SB-E owner! You're predicament, which neither of us realize as such, is deeper than mine.

I've been building PCs -- wholly and profoundly since about 1995, but more or less with Klooges and mods since 1984.

Just slapping together parts, installing OS and drivers and making it run was the limit of my effort before 2004. After that, there were two obsessive priorities:

1) Build a phenomenally great PC with a modest selection of parts without spending more toward the bottom-line of a Maximum PC "Machine of the Year."

2) Build a phenomenally great PC with a good overclock that is rock-stable.

I keep wondering if the OC OC-Disorder will be left standing alone with no more challenges or justification, and some here seem inclined to that thought also. Why overclock, if the processor performs beyond the need for speed?

Only because "we can." And I suppose I'm going to make the outlay for essential Skylake parts just to satisfy my curiosity -- which means that one of these systems will either be redeployed, bequeathed or sold.

But not before I'm satisfied that a Skylake or alternative will be, paraphrasing you, the best system ever.