Originally posted by: flyswatter
Originally posted by: Duvie
Originally posted by: kini62
Yeah you could get an Athlon 64 now, but then you'd be in the same boat your in now as far as video encoding and multi-tasking. The system below isn't much faster at encoding than the XP2400 it replaced. It also isn't much better at multi-tasking either. I didn't want to wait. This system went back and now I'm getting a Dell XPS P4 3.6 with an ATI X850XT PE for the same money. I needed a system to what I want it to do- now, not 6 months down the road.
That said, currently the socket 939 seems to have the best upgrade path. Although Intel says there dual cores will use Socket 775, but a different chip set. Don't know if you can change or upgrade the chipset on a MB or not. It might be the same with AMD, it might be socket 939, but require a different chipset.
You must have seomthing messed up then...No way should a xp2400+ be about the samea sa 3500+ in encoding...look at any review around and that doesn't happen...Either you are using an extremely poor program, one that is not optimized fro SSE2 (which A64 has), or dont know what you are doing....
I agree this one I have isn't as fast as my p4 at 3.5ghz in encoding but it is close in some apps and I have ran a barton 3200+ and it wasn't near my 3.5ghz.....so lets keep a real world perspective here.....
I am admitting one of the more vocal ppl for still getting p4s for users wanting to do these apps and multitasking, but I cant allow you to spread false misconceptions...
It all depends what software you are using to encode. Some are optimized for Intel. I know my OC'd Athlon 64 (939) 2.6GHZ destroys my P4 3.2E on some encoding software while the 3.2E beats my A64 on others. Hyperthreading is all hype and a marketing ploy from intel.
Except he is comparing amd chips...that ius what I am talking about...the A64 should do better then the xp2400+ even in apps not SSE2 optimized...With SSE2 they could gain even more....
Please read and comprehend next time....
