- Dec 14, 2005
- 65
- 0
- 0
A while back, one of the transistors on my EpoX 8RDA+ motherboard blew, and it's left my already aging desktop unusable. So I've been using my laptop exclusively for the last month or two. (That said, it's not that bad, since it has a PM 1.5, a gig of RAM, and a Mobility Radeon 9700.) But still, yeah, I'm considering not waiting to upgrade to AM2. For my last desktop, I built it at the end of Socket 754's lifetime, as well as AGP's lifetime, so now if I want to upgrade to an S939 Opteron or Athlon64, I'll have to upgrade my mobo and video card too. (I don't want to buy a mobo with an AGP slot since that'll last even shorter than my current one.)
So, I'm wondering, should I just buy an S939 mobo (probably an RD580), or just wait for AM2? Are there any real noticable differences between the two besides support for DDR2 and the different HSF mounting? I've already got 1.5GB PC3200 that I don't feel like getting rid of, and I also recently bought a Zalman 7000Cu HSF. At this rate, should I consider waiting for AM2?
So, I'm wondering, should I just buy an S939 mobo (probably an RD580), or just wait for AM2? Are there any real noticable differences between the two besides support for DDR2 and the different HSF mounting? I've already got 1.5GB PC3200 that I don't feel like getting rid of, and I also recently bought a Zalman 7000Cu HSF. At this rate, should I consider waiting for AM2?