• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Should I bite? (AMD 7970)

I would save $100 and go for a 7950 instead. The performance difference doesn't justify the expense, especially if you not going to overclock. Gigabyte 7950 1000Mhz VS. Gigabyte 7970 1000Mhz = 5-8% difference in performance.
 
Yeah, it looks like the voltage is locked, but it appears to already be an OC version and I'm not much into OC'ing video anyway.

I'd agree with face2face... I've had both a 7970 Ghz and a 7950, and the 7950 is very comparable... however I have mine overclocked to 1100/1500, which makes it the same as my 7970 Ghz (which wouldn't overclock much).
 
It seems to me that if he's *absolutely not* overclocking than the 7970 is the better choice. The 7950 basically requires overclocking to reach its potential.
 
It seems to me that if he's *absolutely not* overclocking than the 7970 is the better choice. The 7950 basically requires overclocking to reach its potential.

That is true... a 7950 at stock settings (especially the true stock around 850 on the core) is going to be a dog. You need it around 1000+ to be decent performing. However, I can't see why any 7950 can't reach at least 950 on stock volts.
 
It seems to me that if he's *absolutely not* overclocking than the 7970 is the better choice. The 7950 basically requires overclocking to reach its potential.

The Gigabyte version comes out of the box with a 200Mhz overclock. That should be around 7970 performance for $300.
 
Last edited:
Never buy the top GPU as you're paying for the fact that it's the top dog. The 7950 is faster than my 2 GTX 460 1GB SLI.

I wish I had a pair of them!
 
Back
Top