Should I bite? (AMD 7970)

Face2Face

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2001
4,100
215
106
I would save $100 and go for a 7950 instead. The performance difference doesn't justify the expense, especially if you not going to overclock. Gigabyte 7950 1000Mhz VS. Gigabyte 7970 1000Mhz = 5-8% difference in performance.
 

Eureka

Diamond Member
Sep 6, 2005
3,822
1
81
Yeah, it looks like the voltage is locked, but it appears to already be an OC version and I'm not much into OC'ing video anyway.

I'd agree with face2face... I've had both a 7970 Ghz and a 7950, and the 7950 is very comparable... however I have mine overclocked to 1100/1500, which makes it the same as my 7970 Ghz (which wouldn't overclock much).
 

Cadarin

Member
Jan 14, 2013
30
0
16
It seems to me that if he's *absolutely not* overclocking than the 7970 is the better choice. The 7950 basically requires overclocking to reach its potential.
 

Eureka

Diamond Member
Sep 6, 2005
3,822
1
81
It seems to me that if he's *absolutely not* overclocking than the 7970 is the better choice. The 7950 basically requires overclocking to reach its potential.

That is true... a 7950 at stock settings (especially the true stock around 850 on the core) is going to be a dog. You need it around 1000+ to be decent performing. However, I can't see why any 7950 can't reach at least 950 on stock volts.
 

Face2Face

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2001
4,100
215
106
It seems to me that if he's *absolutely not* overclocking than the 7970 is the better choice. The 7950 basically requires overclocking to reach its potential.

The Gigabyte version comes out of the box with a 200Mhz overclock. That should be around 7970 performance for $300.
 
Last edited:

FalseChristian

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2002
3,322
0
71
Never buy the top GPU as you're paying for the fact that it's the top dog. The 7950 is faster than my 2 GTX 460 1GB SLI.

I wish I had a pair of them!