Fern
Elite Member
- Sep 30, 2003
- 26,907
- 173
- 106
Way to miss the point guys. [Golf Clap emoticon]
It's about records to prove campaign claims/boasts, not investigaing HRC for her activites as First Lady.
GWB and Cheney ain't running anyway.
So, the question is (and has absolutley nothing to do really with any other candidate, much less non-candidates) do you think HRC should produce records supporting her claim of superior experience earned as a First Lady if she wants us to belive it?
It's about records to prove campaign claims/boasts, not investigaing HRC for her activites as First Lady.
GWB and Cheney ain't running anyway.
So, the question is (and has absolutley nothing to do really with any other candidate, much less non-candidates) do you think HRC should produce records supporting her claim of superior experience earned as a First Lady if she wants us to belive it?
Originally posted by: GrGr
I'm all for transparency across the line.
Sure let Hillary disclose her record, but let the Bush administration lead the way showing all their records inlcuding everything they have on torture (in particular cases directly approved by Bush), everything they planned before, during and after the invasion of Iraq etc, all the secret deals by Cheney etc. etc. etc.
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Originally posted by: GrGr
I'm all for transparency across the line.
Sure let Hillary disclose her record, but let the Bush administration lead the way showing all their records inlcuding everything they have on torture (in particular cases directly approved by Bush), everything they planned before, during and after the invasion of Iraq etc, all the secret deals by Cheney etc. etc. etc.
Yeah, aint that the truth. It's been almost 8 years fo the most secret administration ever but all of a sudden all the BushBots are for releasing records..... Of course they don't start a thread asking Bush or Cheney to do so, just the ones they want to bash. Can they get any more transparent?