Savarak
Platinum Member
- Oct 27, 2001
- 2,718
- 1
- 81
Originally posted by: James3shin
:thumbsdown: gladiator style
I'm thinking more of UNREAL TOURNAMENT style
Originally posted by: James3shin
:thumbsdown: gladiator style
Originally posted by: mrrman
he got caught with drugs with the intent to sell so hell yes...this law should be in place in N America to...I dont want no scumbag selling drugs to my kids
Originally posted by: hscorpio
Originally posted by: dug777
he knew the law in singapore, he was stupid enuff to drug traffic there, i've no sympathy for him, sure it seems harsh, but singapore makes no secret of their drug laws...
Save your sympathy for those who actually deserve it.
So where do you draw the line? Why not use the death penalty as a punishment for all crimes?
Originally posted by: trinketsummoner
Originally posted by: hscorpio
Originally posted by: dug777
he knew the law in singapore, he was stupid enuff to drug traffic there, i've no sympathy for him, sure it seems harsh, but singapore makes no secret of their drug laws...
Save your sympathy for those who actually deserve it.
So where do you draw the line? Why not use the death penalty as a punishment for all crimes?
Because the law there doesnt say the death penalty for ALL crimes. If you dont agree with the laws, dont go to that country, or if you live there, try and change them.
Originally posted by: dug777
Originally posted by: trinketsummoner
Originally posted by: hscorpio
Originally posted by: dug777
he knew the law in singapore, he was stupid enuff to drug traffic there, i've no sympathy for him, sure it seems harsh, but singapore makes no secret of their drug laws...
Save your sympathy for those who actually deserve it.
So where do you draw the line? Why not use the death penalty as a punishment for all crimes?
Because the law there doesnt say the death penalty for ALL crimes. If you dont agree with the laws, dont go to that country, or if you live there, try and change them.
Or more simply, don't deal drugs which directly or indirectly kill a lot more people![]()
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: hscorpio
There are two things wrong with killing a man for drug trafficking. First the punishment far exceeds the crime. Here in the US we have this little thing called the constitution, that specifically restricts cruel or unusual punishment. The US supreme court has ruled that the death penalty is unconstitutionally excessive for any crime other than murder. For those of you who think trafficking drugs is worthy of the death penalty, I say your nuts. It's equivalent to suggesting a bartender or liquor store owner should be held criminaly responsible when some idiot drinks himself to death or plows through a pedestrian in his car. In a just and free society the punishment should fit the crime, plain and simple.
the use of the death penalty is something reasonable people could disagree upon. what real authority does a tribunal of 9 unelected countermajoritarian oligarchs have over the rest of the citizenry to require total deference to them in such matters?
and if deterrence is what you want, then the punishment fitting the crime is really only getting you back to the status quo. so, no one is deterred. you would steal if all you had to do when caught was giving the money back. so obviously the punishment must outweight the crime, and probably by quite a big because a lot of crime isn't caught.
Originally posted by: Ronstang
The crime rates in the US are so high because liberal pansies always want to give people who have proven themselves useless to society another chance to find more victims. Why is it that whenever their is a sexual assaut on a child story on the news we find out the guy has done this before and has been let go to rape and murder this time? There are lots of loosers in this world that DO NOT deserve any kind of second chance yet they seem to end up back on the streets. I wish we had harsher sentences like Singapore myself....how long would a child rapist last over there?
Originally posted by: yourdeardaniel
Singapore is retarded. Good thing I don't live there.
He didn't murder anyone so why should he be put to death.
Originally posted by: KingofCamelot
Originally posted by: yourdeardaniel
Singapore is retarded. Good thing I don't live there.
He didn't murder anyone so why should he be put to death.
How narrow minded of you. The punishment should fit the crime, and there are some crimes other than homicide that deserve the death penalty. Now, whether or not I agree with Singapore's killing of drug traffickers is a different topic. Although I do think its a little excessive, it sure does get the point across, doesn't it? Remember, punishments are not only supposed to punish but also to deter future crime. I think Singapore has a much better handle on the deter part of punishment than we have here in the US.
Originally posted by: hscorpio
Originally posted by: KingofCamelot
Originally posted by: yourdeardaniel
Singapore is retarded. Good thing I don't live there.
He didn't murder anyone so why should he be put to death.
How narrow minded of you. The punishment should fit the crime, and there are some crimes other than homicide that deserve the death penalty. Now, whether or not I agree with Singapore's killing of drug traffickers is a different topic. Although I do think its a little excessive, it sure does get the point across, doesn't it? Remember, punishments are not only supposed to punish but also to deter future crime. I think Singapore has a much better handle on the deter part of punishment than we have here in the US.
No doubt they pretty much deter everything there. People couldn't even protest this hanging, because protests involving more than a few people are illegal there. Police state FTW!
Originally posted by: Pocatello
We should have the same law here.
Originally posted by: yourdeardaniel
Singapore is retarded. Good thing I don't live there.
He didn't murder anyone so why should he be put to death.
Originally posted by: hscorpio
Originally posted by: KingofCamelot
Originally posted by: yourdeardaniel
Singapore is retarded. Good thing I don't live there.
He didn't murder anyone so why should he be put to death.
How narrow minded of you. The punishment should fit the crime, and there are some crimes other than homicide that deserve the death penalty. Now, whether or not I agree with Singapore's killing of drug traffickers is a different topic. Although I do think its a little excessive, it sure does get the point across, doesn't it? Remember, punishments are not only supposed to punish but also to deter future crime. I think Singapore has a much better handle on the deter part of punishment than we have here in the US.
No doubt they pretty much deter everything there. People couldn't even protest this hanging, because protests involving more than a few people are illegal there. Police state FTW!
Originally posted by: ed21x
Originally posted by: hscorpio
No doubt they pretty much deter everything there. People couldn't even protest this hanging, because protests involving more than a few people are illegal there. Police state FTW!
bullsh!t. protests are not illegal in singapore. I think you have them mixed up with China. however, having the punishment exceed the crime is a better way to deter people thanthe other way around.
