- Aug 20, 2000
- 20,577
- 432
- 126
I'm of two minds on this.
On the one hand, I would hope that my government would do everything in its power to bring me home and end years of indefinite confinement without trial like in Mr. Khadr's case. He is, in fact, only alleged to have done the crime - the fact that no case against him has concluded either way speaks volumes. Shouldn't we all receive assistance from our government under the assumption that we're innocent, not guilty?
On the other, the Khadr family are amongst the lowest form of scum. I don't especially wish for people like them to receive mandatory help from the government. I mean, sure, you may not have thrown the grenade that killed an American soldier, but it's not like you got caught in the middle of a firefight in Afghanistan while you were innocently stepping out to buy a jug of milk...
Supreme Court warned not to make precedent-setting Khadr ruling
On the one hand, I would hope that my government would do everything in its power to bring me home and end years of indefinite confinement without trial like in Mr. Khadr's case. He is, in fact, only alleged to have done the crime - the fact that no case against him has concluded either way speaks volumes. Shouldn't we all receive assistance from our government under the assumption that we're innocent, not guilty?
On the other, the Khadr family are amongst the lowest form of scum. I don't especially wish for people like them to receive mandatory help from the government. I mean, sure, you may not have thrown the grenade that killed an American soldier, but it's not like you got caught in the middle of a firefight in Afghanistan while you were innocently stepping out to buy a jug of milk...
Supreme Court warned not to make precedent-setting Khadr ruling
OTTAWA -- The Harper government is warning the Supreme Court of Canada against becoming the first court in the western world to declare that a government has a legal duty to protect its citizens detained abroad.
The federal government is appealing a Federal Court order to seek Mr. Khadr's repatriation from Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, where the 23-year-old terror suspect has been held for seven years on charges of murder as a war crime for allegedly throwing a grenade that killed U.S. army medic Christopher Speer in Afghanistan.
Federal lawyers, in written arguments filed in advance of a Friday hearing in the case of Omar Khadr, say that courts in England, Australia and South Africa have all rejected the principle that governments are obligated to intervene, diplomatically or otherwise, to help citizens in trouble with the law on foreign soil.
"Canadian courts should not be used to lobby the government to exercise its discretion in a particular way," says the Justice Department's legal brief.
Federal Court Justice James O'Reilly ruled in April that the government, by its years of indifference toward Mr. Khadr, violated his Charter of Rights guarantee of fundamental justice and, therefore, must pay him back by seeking his return to his birth country.
In particular, Canadian officials failed Mr. Khadr by interviewing him at the U. S. military camp in 2003 and 2004 and then passing on the intelligence to American officials, Justice O'Reilly said. Before the 2004 interview, a Canadian official had been told by the Americans that Mr. Khadr had been subjected to sleep deprivation to induce him to talk.
The Federal Court of Appeal upheld the ruling in August in a 2-1 decision.
Mr. Khadr is the only westerner remaining at the Guantanamo Bay military unit. All other countries have repatriated their citizens.